A la lecture de l'article qui suis par là
On constate qu'il se pourrait que RedHat se mette a violer la GPL. En effet, une close de non divulgation (des sources entre autre) serait désormais demandé a ses clients, sans quoi, plus de support.
Red Hat grants you a personal, non-assignable license to use Red Hat Content for your own internal use while you are a Red Hat Customer (as defined in Section 2 above). Distributing any portion of Red Hat Content to a third party, using any Red Hat Content for the benefit of a third party or using Red Hat Content in connection with software other than Red Hat Software under an active Red Hat subscription are all prohibited. Red Hat authorizes you to display on your computer, download, play and print the Red Hat Content provided: (a) the copyright notice is not removed, (b) Red Hat Content is not be altered, (c) Red Hat Content is used only for your personal, educational and non-commercial use in support of your active valid subscriptions to Red Hat products and services and in accordance with your Customer Agreement, (d) you do not further redistribute or copy Red Hat Content and (e) you comply with any Additional Terms. In the event of a conflict, inconsistency or difference between this Section 6 and the terms of a License or Customer Agreement, the License or Customer Agreement will control (for example, for Red Hat Content licensed under a Creative Commons License, you will have the rights set forth in the applicable Creative Commons License). If you exceed your authorized use of Red Hat Content (for example, if you use Red Hat Content in support of Software for which you do not have an active valid subscription), you may be required under your Customer Agreement to purchase additional subscriptions to Red Hat products. In addition, your right to continue to access Red Hat Content from a Red Hat Portal is subject to your continued compliance with these Terms of Use, your Customer Agreement and the Additional Terms.
Confidentiality.
Red Hat Content may contain information that is designated as "confidential" and you agree not to disclose such information without Red Hat's prior written consent.
Je trouve que ça pose en effet de gros problèmes de compatibilité avec la GPL... car ils ne peuvent pas enpêcher leurs clients de divulguer du code GPL, même s'il leur appartient ou que les patch on été fait par eux.
ça risque de faire des vagues dans la communauté.
# Violation de la GPL
Posté par ecyrbe . En réponse au journal L'engagement de Red Hat envers l'open source. Évalué à 3.
A la lecture de l'article qui suis par là
On constate qu'il se pourrait que RedHat se mette a violer la GPL. En effet, une close de non divulgation (des sources entre autre) serait désormais demandé a ses clients, sans quoi, plus de support.
Voici les paragraphes en question, dans sa licence d'accès:
Use of Content.
Red Hat grants you a personal, non-assignable license to use Red Hat Content for your own internal use while you are a Red Hat Customer (as defined in Section 2 above). Distributing any portion of Red Hat Content to a third party, using any Red Hat Content for the benefit of a third party or using Red Hat Content in connection with software other than Red Hat Software under an active Red Hat subscription are all prohibited. Red Hat authorizes you to display on your computer, download, play and print the Red Hat Content provided: (a) the copyright notice is not removed, (b) Red Hat Content is not be altered, (c) Red Hat Content is used only for your personal, educational and non-commercial use in support of your active valid subscriptions to Red Hat products and services and in accordance with your Customer Agreement, (d) you do not further redistribute or copy Red Hat Content and (e) you comply with any Additional Terms. In the event of a conflict, inconsistency or difference between this Section 6 and the terms of a License or Customer Agreement, the License or Customer Agreement will control (for example, for Red Hat Content licensed under a Creative Commons License, you will have the rights set forth in the applicable Creative Commons License). If you exceed your authorized use of Red Hat Content (for example, if you use Red Hat Content in support of Software for which you do not have an active valid subscription), you may be required under your Customer Agreement to purchase additional subscriptions to Red Hat products. In addition, your right to continue to access Red Hat Content from a Red Hat Portal is subject to your continued compliance with these Terms of Use, your Customer Agreement and the Additional Terms.
Confidentiality.
Red Hat Content may contain information that is designated as "confidential" and you agree not to disclose such information without Red Hat's prior written consent.
Je trouve que ça pose en effet de gros problèmes de compatibilité avec la GPL... car ils ne peuvent pas enpêcher leurs clients de divulguer du code GPL, même s'il leur appartient ou que les patch on été fait par eux. ça risque de faire des vagues dans la communauté.