• [^] # Re: ben faut lire

    Posté par . En réponse au message Licences: utiliser du code MIT dans du code GPL v.3. Évalué à 1.

    la license en elle meme :
    Copyright (c) <copyright holders>

    Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
    obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
    files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
    restriction, including without limitation the rights to use,
    copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
    copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
    Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following
    conditions:

    The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
    included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

    THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
    EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES
    OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
    NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT
    HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
    WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
    FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR
    OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.


    bref il n'y a pas grand chose à changer

    et on voit ici : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_software_licences

    que la GPL v2 est compatible avec la license MIT

    => tu peux faire ton code en utilisant de la license MIT et l'inclure dans ta license GPL

    la difference que je vois entre les deux c'est l'obligation de publier les sources si tu utilise la GPL
    ce qui ne semble pas obliger sous license MIT