• [^] # Re: IEHTML ? Ça existe depuis longtemps !!

    Posté par . En réponse à la dépêche Java, le standard bien connu de Microsoft. Évalué à 1.

    Quelques références :
    Les caractères reconnus par le standard HTML (sous forme de tableaux)
    http://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/html/tagpages/text.htm(...)

    Dans le cas où le caractère n'est pas affichable, le User Agent (le butineur) peut ne pas savoir les afficher (extrait de http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/charset.html#h-5.4(...) ) :

    5.4 Undisplayable characters

    A user agent may not be able to render all characters in a document meaningfully, for instance, because the user agent lacks a suitable font, a character has a value that may
    not be expressed in the user agent's internal character encoding, etc.

    Because there are many different things that may be done in such cases, this document does not prescribe any specific behavior. Depending on the implementation,
    undisplayable characters may also be handled by the underlying display system and not the application itself. In the absence of more sophisticated behavior, for example
    tailored to the needs of a particular script or language, we recommend the following behavior for user agents:

    1.Adopt a clearly visible, but unobtrusive mechanism to alert the user of missing resources.
    2.If missing characters are presented using their numeric representation, use the hexadecimal (not decimal) form since this is the form used in character set standards.


    C'est exactement la raison pour laquelle les caractères «spéciaux» de Microsoft ne sont pas correctement affichés sous GNU/Linux