concernant la licence GPL, voici l'avis de nos juristes et des riques qui peuvent être encourus sans forcément en être conscient.
Alors la je me marre !! Ce document est bien entendu plein de mauvaise foi, et annonce le malheur jusqu'a la septieme generation du programmeur qui ose mettre son programme en GPL. Je te propose plutot de lire l'avis du juriste de la FSF sur http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/enforcing-gpl.html(...)
qui explique justement comment la GPL offre habilement moins de restrictions que la loi sur la propriete intellectuelle.
Allez un bon passage : "Despite the FUD, as a copyright license the GPL is absolutely solid. That's why I've been able to enforce it dozens of times over nearly ten years, without ever going to court.
Meanwhile, much murmuring has been going on in recent months to the supposed effect that the absence of judicial enforcement, in US or other courts, somehow demonstrates that there is something wrong with the GPL, that its unusual policy goal is implemented in a technically indefensible way, or that the Free Software Foundation, which authors the license, is afraid of testing it in court. Precisely the reverse is true. We do not find ourselves taking the GPL to court because no one has yet been willing to risk contesting it with us there."
[^] # Re: Au sujet des licences Open Source/Libre
Posté par zeb . En réponse à la dépêche Lecteur de divx: la GPL violée par des développeurs Russes. Évalué à 1.
Alors la je me marre !! Ce document est bien entendu plein de mauvaise foi, et annonce le malheur jusqu'a la septieme generation du programmeur qui ose mettre son programme en GPL. Je te propose plutot de lire l'avis du juriste de la FSF sur http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/enforcing-gpl.html(...)
qui explique justement comment la GPL offre habilement moins de restrictions que la loi sur la propriete intellectuelle.
Allez un bon passage : "Despite the FUD, as a copyright license the GPL is absolutely solid. That's why I've been able to enforce it dozens of times over nearly ten years, without ever going to court.
Meanwhile, much murmuring has been going on in recent months to the supposed effect that the absence of judicial enforcement, in US or other courts, somehow demonstrates that there is something wrong with the GPL, that its unusual policy goal is implemented in a technically indefensible way, or that the Free Software Foundation, which authors the license, is afraid of testing it in court. Precisely the reverse is true. We do not find ourselves taking the GPL to court because no one has yet been willing to risk contesting it with us there."