After about a minute, Linux had finished removing files. Several messages were printed for the virtual files and directories that could not be removed. Windows, however, took quite a while (probably close to 20 minutes) to delete all the files on the drive, all the while printing a status message for every file it encountered. As it neared the end and had removed large number of system files, I began to get dialog boxes which popped up informing me, not that files were missing, but that files had been replaced with unrecognized versions. I find this to be a very misleading message considering files had not been replaced, but removed from the system entirely. At least 20 of these dialog boxes appeared, some noting which file was missing, others not, like the one pictured.
voila deux points que je trouve critiques :
- pour effacer le meme volume de fichier, l un prend beaucoup plus de temps que l autre -> soit le FS est pourri , soit l operation de traitement est hyper mal codee. Dans les deux cas je conclus que l OS lent est bon a jeter. ( mis a part le fait qu effacer rapidement des fichiers system n est pas bon ... mais qui sur terre effacerait des fichiers systems ? Moi ? jamais ^^ )
- sous windows ... le message d erreur, en plus de n epas etre tres clair, est totallement errone, et ne represente pas la realite technique: cet OS est donc incompetant a diagnostiquer un probleme 'basique'.
et pour finir :
While the important ones required for shutting down the system were obviously locked this made the shutdown seem much more graceful (despite the immenent death I knew would come). Linux, however, lost in style points as it simply gave up, spewing a pink mess across the screen. Normally I would be annoyed with file locking, as it makes it difficult to test a program and build a new version to the same file
donc en gros .. pour mettre a jour un system en production, il faut le rebooter ( ou du moins tuer tous les services qui vont etre mis a jour pendant TOUTE la duree de la mise a jour )
Pour mes besoins, je confirme que Linux est le system qui me plait le plus.
[^] # Re: A propos d'effacement
Posté par doublehp . En réponse au message ma Debian est morte : VIVE MA DEBIAN. Évalué à 1.
voila deux points que je trouve critiques :
- pour effacer le meme volume de fichier, l un prend beaucoup plus de temps que l autre -> soit le FS est pourri , soit l operation de traitement est hyper mal codee. Dans les deux cas je conclus que l OS lent est bon a jeter. ( mis a part le fait qu effacer rapidement des fichiers system n est pas bon ... mais qui sur terre effacerait des fichiers systems ? Moi ? jamais ^^ )
- sous windows ... le message d erreur, en plus de n epas etre tres clair, est totallement errone, et ne represente pas la realite technique: cet OS est donc incompetant a diagnostiquer un probleme 'basique'.
et pour finir :
While the important ones required for shutting down the system were obviously locked this made the shutdown seem much more graceful (despite the immenent death I knew would come). Linux, however, lost in style points as it simply gave up, spewing a pink mess across the screen. Normally I would be annoyed with file locking, as it makes it difficult to test a program and build a new version to the same file
donc en gros .. pour mettre a jour un system en production, il faut le rebooter ( ou du moins tuer tous les services qui vont etre mis a jour pendant TOUTE la duree de la mise a jour )
Pour mes besoins, je confirme que Linux est le system qui me plait le plus.