2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:
c) If the modified program normally reads commands interactively when run, you must cause it, when started running for such interactive use in the most ordinary way, to print or display an announcement including an appropriate copyright notice and a notice that there is no warranty (or else, saying that you provide a warranty) and that users may redistribute the program under these conditions, and telling the user how to view a copy of this License. (Exception: if the Program itself is interactive but does not normally print such an announcement, your work based on the Program is not required to print an announcement.)
These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those sections when you distribute them as separate works.
On peut donc regarder le fonctionnement d'un logiciel libre, et de là le recréer à partir de zéro ou presque (on s'inspire de la méthode effectuée) pour créer un logiciel privateur ou autre.
Enfin, si j'ai bien compris, car je ne suis pas avocat.
Commentaire sous licence LPRAB - http://sam.zoy.org/lprab/
# Dans le détail, ce FUD est bidon
Posté par Zarmakuizz . En réponse au journal Différence de licence entre une réimplémentation complète et le projet source. Évalué à 7.
Ensuite je vois des passages dans le texte de la GPLv2 assez intéressants :
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:
c) If the modified program normally reads commands interactively when run, you must cause it, when started running for such interactive use in the most ordinary way, to print or display an announcement including an appropriate copyright notice and a notice that there is no warranty (or else, saying that you provide a warranty) and that users may redistribute the program under these conditions, and telling the user how to view a copy of this License. (Exception: if the Program itself is interactive but does not normally print such an announcement, your work based on the Program is not required to print an announcement.)
These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those sections when you distribute them as separate works.
On peut donc regarder le fonctionnement d'un logiciel libre, et de là le recréer à partir de zéro ou presque (on s'inspire de la méthode effectuée) pour créer un logiciel privateur ou autre.
Enfin, si j'ai bien compris, car je ne suis pas avocat.
Commentaire sous licence LPRAB - http://sam.zoy.org/lprab/