http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=100375761618453&(...)
> > > This would then presumably lead to password protected access for US kernel
> > > developers that need to know? And some kind of NDA?
> > > > US kernel developers cannot be told. Period.
> > Huh, US resident or US citizens?
> > If US resident , does that mean we can't send security patches to
> Linus.
You can send him the patch. It appears you cannot tell him which
vulnerability it fixes.
That is, unless the 'code = speech' people have succeded in setting enough
precedent, in which case even 'code' may become a 'circumvention device'!
I am not a lawyer though, but at this point logic seems so far away that
anything appears possible.
[^] # Re: Alan Cox a dit:
Posté par Nÿco (site web personnel) . En réponse à la dépêche DMCA, quand tu nous tiens. Évalué à -1.
> > > This would then presumably lead to password protected access for US kernel
> > > developers that need to know? And some kind of NDA?
> > > > US kernel developers cannot be told. Period.
> > Huh, US resident or US citizens?
> > If US resident , does that mean we can't send security patches to
> Linus.
You can send him the patch. It appears you cannot tell him which
vulnerability it fixes.
That is, unless the 'code = speech' people have succeded in setting enough
precedent, in which case even 'code' may become a 'circumvention device'!
I am not a lawyer though, but at this point logic seems so far away that
anything appears possible.