• # The Elements Of Style: UNIX As Literature

    Posté par . En réponse au journal Au secours! Mark Shuttleworth veut simplifier les logiciels !. Évalué à 7.

    L'interface n'est pas la solution , parce que le langage permettra toujours des finesses que ne permet pas le clickodrome .

    Faut demander à Mark de relire ses classiques :

    The Elements Of Style: UNIX As Literature
    http://www.rap.ucar.edu/staff/tres/elements.html

    "
    There was a standard litany of more specific criticisms: UNIX is difficult and time-consuming to learn. There are too many things to remember. It's arcane and needlessly complex.

    But the most recurrent complaint was that it was too text-oriented. People really hated the command line, with all the utilities, obscure flags, and arguments they had to memorize. They hated all the typing. One mislaid character and you had to start over. Interestingly, this complaint came most often from users of the GUI-laden Macintosh or Windows platforms. People who had slaved away on DOS batch scripts or spent their days on character-based terminals of multiuser non-UNIX machines were less likely to express the same grievance.

    (...)


    I will admit NT made my life easier in some respects. I found myself doing less remembering (names of utilities, command arguments, syntax) and more recognizing (solution components associated with check boxes, radio buttons, and pull-downs). I spent much less time typing. Certainly my right hand spent much more time herding the mouse around the desktop. But after a few months I started to get a tired, desolate feeling, akin to the fatigue I feel after too much channel surfing or videogaming: too much time spent reacting, not enough spent in active analysis and expression. In short, image-culture burnout. "