Je pense même que TomTom a touché du pognon de MS. Ou alors TomTom a gagné de ne pas subir le FUD de MS comme Novell.
Ceci permet à MS de continuer avec son "axe du mal".
The FAT filesystem patents on which Microsoft sued are now and have always been invalid patents in our professional opinion.
SFLC, working with the Open Invention Network and the Linux Foundation, is pleased to participate in a coordinated, carefully graduated response on behalf of all the community's members to ongoing anti-competitive Microsoft conduct.
Ce n'est pas terminé cette affaire. Dommage que TomTom ait quitté le navire.
[^] # Re: Surprenant
Posté par IsNotGood . En réponse au journal TomTom et MS : suite et fin. Évalué à 4.
Ceci permet à MS de continuer avec son "axe du mal".
Pour Red Hat il n'y a pas de violation de brevet (pour Linux) :
http://www.press.redhat.com/2009/03/30/comment-on-tomtom-mic(...)
Plus important, l'avis (et plus) de la SFLC :
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2009/mar/30/settled-not-(...)
Today's settlement between Microsoft and TomTom ends one phase of the community's response to Microsoft patent aggression, and begins another.
The FAT filesystem patents on which Microsoft sued are now and have always been invalid patents in our professional opinion.
SFLC, working with the Open Invention Network and the Linux Foundation, is pleased to participate in a coordinated, carefully graduated response on behalf of all the community's members to ongoing anti-competitive Microsoft conduct.
Ce n'est pas terminé cette affaire. Dommage que TomTom ait quitté le navire.