Il y a 10 ans on étais là et tous ses avancés existaient déjà. Mais même, il y a 50 ans, on ne sortais pas les filles de l'école et on ne lapidait pas.
Et ne mélange pas tout. On parle égalité de sexe et tu parles répressif
Le dernier remet bien dans l'ambiance : http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/766683.htm(...)
"French terrorism fight may offer Obama an alternative"
"The group warned that France's expansive use of the law was stretching the legal system to the breaking point by undermining the rights of suspects, using information allegedly obtained by torture in questionable countries and rounding up innocent men."
"Experts such as Shapiro and James Lewis, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the U.S. probably wouldn't embrace France's tougher domestic-intelligence system.
"There's a limit to what we can do on domestic intelligence," Lewis said.
To contain terrorist threats, France relies on a broad racketeering-style law that allows police to imprison people who are loosely affiliated with suspects. That, critics say, casts too wide a net.
Human Rights Watch said that suspects in France had been arrested and jailed, often for years, because they were part of a hiking group with a suspected terrorist or because they went to the same pizzeria in the low-income Paris suburbs famous for making pizzas with meat specially prepared for Muslim devotees.
"It is true that French secret services have been one of the most efficient, but the price is high," said William Bourdon, a veteran human-rights attorney in Paris. "What is the price of efficiency if you simultaneously contribute to worsening the feeling of persecution and stigmatization that provides arguments for Salafists in little clandestine mosques north of Paris, who use this bitterness to recruit new people?"
Et dire que l'on plaignait les US et leur loi post 11 septembre...
[^] # Re: Marchandise?!
Posté par Nicolas Boulay (site web personnel) . En réponse au journal Les mariages forcés et le Libre. Évalué à 1.
Et ne mélange pas tout. On parle égalité de sexe et tu parles répressif
J'aime bien http://www.frenchmorning.com qui pointe vers des articles anglais sur la france.
Le dernier remet bien dans l'ambiance :
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/766683.htm(...)
"French terrorism fight may offer Obama an alternative"
"The group warned that France's expansive use of the law was stretching the legal system to the breaking point by undermining the rights of suspects, using information allegedly obtained by torture in questionable countries and rounding up innocent men."
"Experts such as Shapiro and James Lewis, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the U.S. probably wouldn't embrace France's tougher domestic-intelligence system.
"There's a limit to what we can do on domestic intelligence," Lewis said.
To contain terrorist threats, France relies on a broad racketeering-style law that allows police to imprison people who are loosely affiliated with suspects. That, critics say, casts too wide a net.
Human Rights Watch said that suspects in France had been arrested and jailed, often for years, because they were part of a hiking group with a suspected terrorist or because they went to the same pizzeria in the low-income Paris suburbs famous for making pizzas with meat specially prepared for Muslim devotees.
"It is true that French secret services have been one of the most efficient, but the price is high," said William Bourdon, a veteran human-rights attorney in Paris. "What is the price of efficiency if you simultaneously contribute to worsening the feeling of persecution and stigmatization that provides arguments for Salafists in little clandestine mosques north of Paris, who use this bitterness to recruit new people?"
Et dire que l'on plaignait les US et leur loi post 11 septembre...
"La première sécurité est la liberté"