En passant, ce qui n'est pas apprécié par une partie de la communauté Fedora, c'est ça : http://lwn.net/Articles/297568/
Red Hat is clearly holding all information about the intrusion as a closely guarded secret—whether that is at the behest of law enforcement or just lawyers is unclear. While there was no timeline given, the clear sense that one got from the meeting is that it might be weeks or months before clearance will be granted to even confirm that they know how the intrusion occurred. In addition, the Fedora board has not been officially briefed on the incident; some members have knowledge because of their Red Hat responsibilities, but the rest are in the dark. If one needed a reminder that Fedora is not an independent distribution, but instead is subject to the whims of Red Hat, this is a clear demonstration.
Mais beaucoup apprécie l'investissement de Red Hat dans Fedora. Donc qu'en passer ?
[^] # Re: Et au fait
Posté par IsNotGood . En réponse au journal Fedora 10 prend un peu de retard. Évalué à 2.
http://lwn.net/Articles/297568/
Red Hat is clearly holding all information about the intrusion as a closely guarded secret—whether that is at the behest of law enforcement or just lawyers is unclear. While there was no timeline given, the clear sense that one got from the meeting is that it might be weeks or months before clearance will be granted to even confirm that they know how the intrusion occurred. In addition, the Fedora board has not been officially briefed on the incident; some members have knowledge because of their Red Hat responsibilities, but the rest are in the dark. If one needed a reminder that Fedora is not an independent distribution, but instead is subject to the whims of Red Hat, this is a clear demonstration.
Mais beaucoup apprécie l'investissement de Red Hat dans Fedora. Donc qu'en passer ?