Red Hat believes that the text of the OSP [Open Specification Promise] gives sufficient flexibility to implement the listed specifications in software licensed under free and open source licenses. We commend Microsoft's efforts to reach out to representatives from the open source community and solicit their feedback on this text, and Microsoft's willingness to make modifications in response to our comments."
Let's examine what I said, what I didn't say, the question answered in the Microsoft piece, and the question not asked.
My statement is that the Open Specification Promise is sufficiently flexible that it is compatible with the requirements of most free and open source licenses. I believed that to be a true statement when I made it, and I still believe it to be true.
Clair et net.
Andy Updegrove n'a jamais dit que c'était compatible GPL.
[^] # Re: T'as raison
Posté par pasBill pasGates . En réponse au journal Comme soupconne OSP est une arnaque!. Évalué à -1.
http://blogs.redhat.com/executive/
Red Hat believes that the text of the OSP [Open Specification Promise] gives sufficient flexibility to implement the listed specifications in software licensed under free and open source licenses. We commend Microsoft's efforts to reach out to representatives from the open source community and solicit their feedback on this text, and Microsoft's willingness to make modifications in response to our comments."
Let's examine what I said, what I didn't say, the question answered in the Microsoft piece, and the question not asked.
My statement is that the Open Specification Promise is sufficiently flexible that it is compatible with the requirements of most free and open source licenses. I believed that to be a true statement when I made it, and I still believe it to be true.
Clair et net.
Andy Updegrove n'a jamais dit que c'était compatible GPL.
Si, cf. mon lien plus haut.
Et si il est avocat: http://www.gesmer.com/attorneys/updegrove.php