ce tag est decrit dans le document de 6000 pages + 2300 pages de "corrections" et non defini malgre tout. Encore un grand moment de documentation visiblement et tu as pas du bien lire le commentaire de Alez Brown (qui pourtant tente de pas mal vous aider a passer ISO):
"While the UK position is undecided, and it would be foolish to try and second guess it, it seems to me personally that one position is ruled-out: a straight unqualified "yes". This is because, leaving aside wider considerations, the text is often simply so poorly written. My colleague, and fellow BSI panellist, Andrew Sales, singled out this paragraph from page 1912 of the spreadsheetML specification as a particularly telling example:
"Specifies a boolean value that indicates whether the application has been inspected the workbook for personally identifying information (PII). If this flag is set, the application warns the user any time the user performs do an action that will insert PII into the document. For example,
inserting a comment might inserts the user’s name."
Such gobbledegook has no place in an ISO standard; seeing this, one can only wonder at the rigour of Ecma’s standards process, and conclude that something is wrong that needs fixing."
Pour ta gouverne je ne cherchais pas le lien, je suis juste alle lire comme souvent kde planet et il y avais ca provenant d'un gars tellement "debile" que c'est un dev de koffice et donc je soupconne qu'il s'y connait un chouilla plus que toi la dedans.
[^] # Re: Il est ou PasBill PasGates ????
Posté par abramov_MS . En réponse au journal Vista c'est vraiment un OS rigolo :). Évalué à 1.
"While the UK position is undecided, and it would be foolish to try and second guess it, it seems to me personally that one position is ruled-out: a straight unqualified "yes". This is because, leaving aside wider considerations, the text is often simply so poorly written. My colleague, and fellow BSI panellist, Andrew Sales, singled out this paragraph from page 1912 of the spreadsheetML specification as a particularly telling example:
"Specifies a boolean value that indicates whether the application has been inspected the workbook for personally identifying information (PII). If this flag is set, the application warns the user any time the user performs do an action that will insert PII into the document. For example,
inserting a comment might inserts the user’s name."
Such gobbledegook has no place in an ISO standard; seeing this, one can only wonder at the rigour of Ecma’s standards process, and conclude that something is wrong that needs fixing."
Pour ta gouverne je ne cherchais pas le lien, je suis juste alle lire comme souvent kde planet et il y avais ca provenant d'un gars tellement "debile" que c'est un dev de koffice et donc je soupconne qu'il s'y connait un chouilla plus que toi la dedans.