Je n'ai pas envie de me faire chier avec tes mensonges.
ECMA a clairement indiqué qu'il ne feront que la maintenance (au sens ISO, c-à-d en gros les corrections d'orthographe).
To assume responsibility for maintaining the Ecma Office Open XML standard
To evaluate and consider proposals for complementary or additional technology To assume responsibility for the evolution of the Ecma standard while ensuring backward compatibility with the previous versions to guarantee continuity in the use of the current and future formats
Et au fait, tu ne m'as toujours pas montre en quoi Mac Office 2008 est incompatible avec Office 2007, j'attends.
Où existe ce document chez ECMA pour OOXML ?
Cherche pas, il n'existe pas.
Si l'ECMA avait une telle procédure, la gestion des dates, par exemple, ne serait pas la chianlie que c'est.
Les by-laws definissent clairement que les standards sont approuves par vote :
3.8.1
Ordinary membership may be applied for by a company which has interest and experience in matters related to one or more Technical Committees of the Association, and which wishes to exert the right to vote at the General Assembly and to exert other exclusive rights defined in the By-laws and Rules.
3.8.2
The representative of each ordinary member will have one vote in the General Assembly.
Voting rights may be exerted with effect from the first full month upon admission as Ecma member.
...
4.1
Application for membership and membership class shall be made to the Secretary General.
The application shall specify that the applicant has received the By-laws, the Rules and the Code of Conduct in Patent Matters, and declare that it adheres to them without restriction. The applicant shall indicate the Technical Committees in the work of which it intends to take part.
4.2
Decisions on acceptance shall be made by the General Assembly with a two thirds majority of all the ordinary members.
...
9.1
The adoption of such documents for publication by the Association shall require approval by at least two thirds of all the ordinary members.
Bref, c'est un systeme totalement ouvert et democratique, contrairement a ce que tu dis.
Faux, OSP ne convre que ce qui est requis par la spèc pour être conforme. Et comme pour être conforme pratiquement rien n'est requis...
Mais tu le sais déjà. Tu fudes encore et encore. Tu ments et tu ments,.
En passant, la réponse de l'ECMA à l'ISO est claire. Je ne vais pas la remettre encore.
Q: The specification I am interested in has some required portions and some optional portions, does the OSP apply to both?
A: Yes, the OSP covers Necessary Claims for both required and optional portions of the Covered Specifications. Under the paragraph entitled "Covered Specifications" is the language that makes it clear that the OSP applied to portions of the Covered Specifications that are optional. ("This Promise also applies to the required elements of optional portions of such specifications.")
De nouveau, SUR CHAQUE POINT, tu as tort, et cela est prouve de maniere claire et net par le texte en question.
Bref, va prendre un rendez-vous chez un psy mon cher.
[^] # Re: Re:
Posté par pasBill pasGates . En réponse au journal Compte rendu BRM OOXML en français. Évalué à 0.
ECMA a clairement indiqué qu'il ne feront que la maintenance (au sens ISO, c-à-d en gros les corrections d'orthographe).
Et une connerie de plus a ton actif: http://www.ecma-international.org/memento/TC45.htm
To assume responsibility for maintaining the Ecma Office Open XML standard
To evaluate and consider proposals for complementary or additional technology
To assume responsibility for the evolution of the Ecma standard while ensuring backward compatibility with the previous versions to guarantee continuity in the use of the current and future formats
Et au fait, tu ne m'as toujours pas montre en quoi Mac Office 2008 est incompatible avec Office 2007, j'attends.
Où existe ce document chez ECMA pour OOXML ?
Cherche pas, il n'existe pas.
Si l'ECMA avait une telle procédure, la gestion des dates, par exemple, ne serait pas la chianlie que c'est.
Et hop une connerie de plus. http://www.ecma-international.org/memento/Ecmabylaws.htm#art(...)
Les by-laws definissent clairement que les standards sont approuves par vote :
3.8.1
Ordinary membership may be applied for by a company which has interest and experience in matters related to one or more Technical Committees of the Association, and which wishes to exert the right to vote at the General Assembly and to exert other exclusive rights defined in the By-laws and Rules.
3.8.2
The representative of each ordinary member will have one vote in the General Assembly.
Voting rights may be exerted with effect from the first full month upon admission as Ecma member.
...
4.1
Application for membership and membership class shall be made to the Secretary General.
The application shall specify that the applicant has received the By-laws, the Rules and the Code of Conduct in Patent Matters, and declare that it adheres to them without restriction. The applicant shall indicate the Technical Committees in the work of which it intends to take part.
4.2
Decisions on acceptance shall be made by the General Assembly with a two thirds majority of all the ordinary members.
...
9.1
The adoption of such documents for publication by the Association shall require approval by at least two thirds of all the ordinary members.
Bref, c'est un systeme totalement ouvert et democratique, contrairement a ce que tu dis.
Faux, OSP ne convre que ce qui est requis par la spèc pour être conforme. Et comme pour être conforme pratiquement rien n'est requis...
Mais tu le sais déjà. Tu fudes encore et encore. Tu ments et tu ments,.
En passant, la réponse de l'ECMA à l'ISO est claire. Je ne vais pas la remettre encore.
C'est 100% faux, OSP couvre ce qui est requis ET ce qui est optionel: http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp/default.mspx
Q: The specification I am interested in has some required portions and some optional portions, does the OSP apply to both?
A: Yes, the OSP covers Necessary Claims for both required and optional portions of the Covered Specifications. Under the paragraph entitled "Covered Specifications" is the language that makes it clear that the OSP applied to portions of the Covered Specifications that are optional. ("This Promise also applies to the required elements of optional portions of such specifications.")
De nouveau, SUR CHAQUE POINT, tu as tort, et cela est prouve de maniere claire et net par le texte en question.
Bref, va prendre un rendez-vous chez un psy mon cher.