• [^] # Re: Pour suivre les détails

    Posté par . En réponse au journal OOXML dans les choux d'ici 30 jours. Évalué à 3.

    un autre article sur le sujet de la part d'un representant de la malaisie:

    http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/2008/03/geneva-day-five.html

    je pense que la partie la plus interessante est celle la:

    We eventually found out that if any changes affected current implementations it would certainly be rejected. This seriously compromised any elegant solutions, and it forced us to be mindful of the "existing corpus of documents" in the wild. I personally don't believe that that should be our problem, but there was a large and vocal voting bloc which would oppose any changes to the spec which would 'break' Ecma 376.

    This was why appeasing Ecma had to happen. Even though they rushed their Ecma International Standard, and Microsoft took the risk in shipping Microsoft Office 2007 last year, we now have to bear the burden of having to support its limitations. This also means that future maintenance changes would get harder and harder.


    En gros c'est exactement comme c'est prevu: Microsoft a fait son pseudo format ouvert dans son coin et tente de le forcer en tant que "norme".