C'est une encyclopédie en ligne sur le modèle de Wikipedia mais écrite par des universitaires.
Pour un passage en revue des différences :
However, Scholarpedia differs from Wikipedia in some very important ways:
* Each article is written by an expert (invited or elected by the public).
* Each article is anonymously peer reviewed to ensure accurate and reliable information.
* Each article has a curator - typically its author -- who is responsible for its content.
* Any modification of the article needs to be approved by the curator before it appears in the final, approved version.
évidemment le problème c'est qu'il n'y a pas des masses d'articles....
[^] # Re: Il faudrait rester raionnable.
Posté par patrick_g (site web personnel) . En réponse au journal Encore Wikipédia. Évalué à 3.
C'est une encyclopédie en ligne sur le modèle de Wikipedia mais écrite par des universitaires.
Pour un passage en revue des différences :
However, Scholarpedia differs from Wikipedia in some very important ways:
* Each article is written by an expert (invited or elected by the public).
* Each article is anonymously peer reviewed to ensure accurate and reliable information.
* Each article has a curator - typically its author -- who is responsible for its content.
* Any modification of the article needs to be approved by the curator before it appears in the final, approved version.
évidemment le problème c'est qu'il n'y a pas des masses d'articles....