>> For me, the main problem is that there are ReactOS developers who
>> think that examining Windows assembly to write ReactOS code is a
>> proper way to do things.
> I think the problem is that the way you describe is totally legal in
> most countries.
> In fact, afaik it is only in the USA where you have this explicit
> distinction between clean("chinese wall") and "dirty" reverse engineering.
> Which reminds me of a similiar thread on lkml about which country's laws
> actually applies
[^] # Re: vista
Posté par ragnar . En réponse au journal Version RC3 de ReactOs 0.3.0 disponible. Évalué à 3.
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2006-June/048468.(...)
Lis bien à quoi il réponds.
>> For me, the main problem is that there are ReactOS developers who
>> think that examining Windows assembly to write ReactOS code is a
>> proper way to do things.
> I think the problem is that the way you describe is totally legal in
> most countries.
> In fact, afaik it is only in the USA where you have this explicit
> distinction between clean("chinese wall") and "dirty" reverse engineering.
> Which reminds me of a similiar thread on lkml about which country's laws
> actually applies
La date :
Fri Jun 9 20:03:06 CDT 2006