• [^] # Re: pwc ?

    Posté par . En réponse au journal pwc le retour. Évalué à 3.

    ben, si tu regarde le lien du journal : http://www.kernel.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/li(...) tu vera que d'apres philips le code RE n'est pas valide :


    The original pwc author raised some questions about the reverse
    engineering of the decompressor algorithms used in the pwc driver.
    Having done some detailed investigation it appears those concerns that
    clean room policy was not followed are reasonable. I've also had a
    friendly discussion with Philips to ask their view on this.
    [...]
    Note that while its easy to say that it should have been caught earlier,
    but the violation was really only obvious to someone who had access to
    both the proprietary source and the 'GPL' source.


    PS : oui, j'ai pas ete tres clair, m'enfin c'est qu'un journal prive...