RMS n'est pas le dernier des plaisantins

Je le dis tout de suite, je ne l'aime pas.
Mais, quand je lis là : http://agia.fsf.org/rms-blog/rms-entry-20041005(...) ce paragraphe :

While walking into the conference room, and discussing with Francis what I should say in my question, I received a phone call telling me that the car had crashed and one of the men who had driven with me was dead.

This was a sobering thought. I did not feel personal grief, because it was not a personal loss. The three were strangers who had helped me for the sake of free software, rather than personal friends, and we only barely had begun to be acquainted. However, it was weighty to realize that someone had died because he had helped me get to Paris for this meeting. I did not feel guilt about his death--I did not cause the accident--but I felt a responsibility to make his death count for something.

Ca me fout un peu les boules. Il y a en effet là une espèce de rattrapage aux branches pour faire de ce brave néerlandais une espèce de martyr pour l'open-sourcitude qui, vraiment, me fait penser à une secte.

Bon, à part ça, le document a été créé par Johns ...