dernièrement l'approbation du projet DotGNU (implémentation libre de Microsoft .Net) par la FSF laisse perplexe
Je vais sur http://dotgnu.org(...) et je lis : "DotGNU will be a complete replacement for the .NET strategy - it will not be a Free Software implementation of .NET. While .NET has some very sound ideas, problems arise with its implementation, especially with the Authentication/Authorization systems which are centralized to Microsoft, and with Microsft's vision for "web services". DotGNU will use a decentralized paradigm, no single company, server or entity will control authorization. Secondly DotGNU will emphasize security, it will use encryption wherever possible to keep user data secure and hidden." ... ce qui est quand-meme un poil different !
Avant d'ecrire des dizaines de messages trollesques et de deriver sur un GNOME/KDE ridicule, ce serait bien de verifier l'exactitude de l'info !
--
Yann. (alias Yoyo_B, momentanement expatrie et non-authentifie)
# Faaaaaaaaaaauuuuuuuuuuuux !!!!!
Posté par Anonyme . En réponse à la dépêche La FSF est-elle dépassée ?. Évalué à 0.
Je vais sur http://dotgnu.org(...) et je lis : "DotGNU will be a complete replacement for the .NET strategy - it will not be a Free Software implementation of .NET. While .NET has some very sound ideas, problems arise with its implementation, especially with the Authentication/Authorization systems which are centralized to Microsoft, and with Microsft's vision for "web services". DotGNU will use a decentralized paradigm, no single company, server or entity will control authorization. Secondly DotGNU will emphasize security, it will use encryption wherever possible to keep user data secure and hidden." ... ce qui est quand-meme un poil different !
Avant d'ecrire des dizaines de messages trollesques et de deriver sur un GNOME/KDE ridicule, ce serait bien de verifier l'exactitude de l'info !
--
Yann. (alias Yoyo_B, momentanement expatrie et non-authentifie)