Lorsque Debian 3.1 va sortir, elle sera testé par des gens qui connaissent d'autres distributions et feront aussi un papier.
Que va-t-il se passer de nouveau la sortie de Debian 3.1 par rapport à Debian 3.0 ?
Rien.
Exemple d'un test de Debian 3.0 (il y a presque 2 ans !) : http://www.debianplanet.org/node.php?id=831(...)
Installation
(...)
The point of all this reminiscing is to show that I'm not a complete neophyte (though I'm nowhere near being a guru for that matter).(NB: pensez y avant de le prendre pour un con.)
(...) I have to admit I was disappointed both with the installation procedure and the finished system. In all my time with Linux, Debian's is the worst installer I've ever had to use.
(...) Setup
There is a lot wrong with it, but mainly the fact is that it's an awfully stupid piece of software. And I don't mean stupid as in bad, I mean as in not clever. It expects the user to know everything.
(...)
This is simple fundamental stuff, the kind of thing most other distros had sorted out back in '99 when everything was via textmode and the Linux GUI was new and exciting. However, in this day and age, I would expect far more from a distribution.
(...)
This willfull stupidity of the installer extends to other aspects of the setup also - with so many kernels available, Debian should pick the most appropriate one to use for my system. It's not that hard to open up /proc/cpuinfo. Instead I was confronted with a maze of kernels once I got to the software selection stage, installed 2.4.18, and then belatedly realised that only 2.4.16 had the ALSA drivers I wanted.
(...)
The Installation Overall
I want to make sure people realise I'm not trying to advocate a graphical installer. It would be a good move ahead, and should be available for Debian 4.0 (Ben non... )
(...)
The Configured System
Having finally got everything installed, I was, I confess, pretty disappointed with the results. Bugs started appearing.
(...)
The fact is, I'm going to have to invest a considerable amount of time just to get things to the same level that Mandrake and RedHat give straight out of the default install. This is not something that will attract new people.
Conclusions
(...)
Debian should organise people to collect code from the Webmin, Linuxconf and Mandrake configuration programs and create Debian's own configuration framework. At this stage of Linux development it's compulsory, even RedHat has finally copped on to this. Indeed, I would recommend following RedHat in several arenas.
(...)
Debian maintainers should check out the competition now and again, to see where they can improve. Because if they don't, Debian will lose developers, and become less and less of a force in the Linux world.
Bref, tu prends les conclusions d'un test de Debian 3.0 (vieux de 2 ans) et c'est globalement applicable à 3.1.
Finalement ça n'a rien d'étonnant vu le niveau d'autisme des "fous de Debian".
Je paris que c'est ce qu'il va se passer lors de la sortie de Debian 3.1.
# Bilan 2
Posté par 007 . En réponse au journal Debian : J'ai le coeur fendu par toi (long). Évalué à 0.
Lorsque Debian 3.1 va sortir, elle sera testé par des gens qui connaissent d'autres distributions et feront aussi un papier.
Que va-t-il se passer de nouveau la sortie de Debian 3.1 par rapport à Debian 3.0 ?
Rien.
Exemple d'un test de Debian 3.0 (il y a presque 2 ans !) :
http://www.debianplanet.org/node.php?id=831(...)
Installation
(...)
The point of all this reminiscing is to show that I'm not a complete neophyte (though I'm nowhere near being a guru for that matter).(NB: pensez y avant de le prendre pour un con.)
(...)
I have to admit I was disappointed both with the installation procedure and the finished system. In all my time with Linux, Debian's is the worst installer I've ever had to use.
(...)
Setup
There is a lot wrong with it, but mainly the fact is that it's an awfully stupid piece of software. And I don't mean stupid as in bad, I mean as in not clever. It expects the user to know everything.
(...)
This is simple fundamental stuff, the kind of thing most other distros had sorted out back in '99 when everything was via textmode and the Linux GUI was new and exciting. However, in this day and age, I would expect far more from a distribution.
(...)
This willfull stupidity of the installer extends to other aspects of the setup also - with so many kernels available, Debian should pick the most appropriate one to use for my system. It's not that hard to open up /proc/cpuinfo. Instead I was confronted with a maze of kernels once I got to the software selection stage, installed 2.4.18, and then belatedly realised that only 2.4.16 had the ALSA drivers I wanted.
(...)
The Installation Overall
I want to make sure people realise I'm not trying to advocate a graphical installer. It would be a good move ahead, and should be available for Debian 4.0 (Ben non... )
(...)
The Configured System
Having finally got everything installed, I was, I confess, pretty disappointed with the results. Bugs started appearing.
(...)
The fact is, I'm going to have to invest a considerable amount of time just to get things to the same level that Mandrake and RedHat give straight out of the default install. This is not something that will attract new people.
Conclusions
(...)
Debian should organise people to collect code from the Webmin, Linuxconf and Mandrake configuration programs and create Debian's own configuration framework. At this stage of Linux development it's compulsory, even RedHat has finally copped on to this. Indeed, I would recommend following RedHat in several arenas.
(...)
Debian maintainers should check out the competition now and again, to see where they can improve. Because if they don't, Debian will lose developers, and become less and less of a force in the Linux world.
Bref, tu prends les conclusions d'un test de Debian 3.0 (vieux de 2 ans) et c'est globalement applicable à 3.1.
Finalement ça n'a rien d'étonnant vu le niveau d'autisme des "fous de Debian".
Je paris que c'est ce qu'il va se passer lors de la sortie de Debian 3.1.