Dans le genre marrant, la justification de ce que Sam évoque dans son PS. n'est pas mal non plus... C'est à peine croyable...
Je cite slashdot: SCO's legal position is actually a little too crazy to believe: The GPL allows unlimited copies, the copyright law allows one. Therefore, the GPL is invalid. Apparently, they try to argue that the copyright law, in giving consumers the right to make one backup of their software without any permission from the copyright holder, outlaws any contractual agreement that allows users to make more than one copy.
[^] # Re: 1 millions de lignes de codes auraient été volés à SCO dans Linux !
Posté par Benjamin . En réponse au journal 1 millions de lignes de codes auraient été volés à SCO dans Linux !. Évalué à 3.
Je cite slashdot:
SCO's legal position is actually a little too crazy to believe: The GPL allows unlimited copies, the copyright law allows one. Therefore, the GPL is invalid. Apparently, they try to argue that the copyright law, in giving consumers the right to make one backup of their software without any permission from the copyright holder, outlaws any contractual agreement that allows users to make more than one copy.
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/14/1521256&mode=thread(...)