> le Hurd est censé avoir remplacé Linux depuis 10 ans.
Le Hurd n'est plus une priorité.
RMS (extraits): « what I think about the HURD is that finishing it is not crucial. When we started the HURD, no usable free kernel existed. That problem does not exist today. Linux works ok as a kernel. The obstacle [is] rather the use of devices whose specs are secret. That's why our high priority task list* includes items relating to free drivers, but not the HURD. » http://blog.reddit.com/2010/07/rms-ama.html (question 13)
[^] # Re: Et si finalement
Posté par JGO . En réponse à la dépêche Le FBI a-t-il introduit des portes dérobées dans OpenBSD ?. Évalué à 3.
Le Hurd n'est plus une priorité.
RMS (extraits): « what I think about the HURD is that finishing it is not crucial. When we started the HURD, no usable free kernel existed. That problem does not exist today. Linux works ok as a kernel. The obstacle [is] rather the use of devices whose specs are secret. That's why our high priority task list* includes items relating to free drivers, but not the HURD. »
http://blog.reddit.com/2010/07/rms-ama.html (question 13)
* http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/priority-projects/