• [^] # Re: Architectures supportées - le pied dedans

    Posté par . En réponse à la dépêche Sortie d'OpenBSD 4.2. Évalué à 10.

    Supported platforms

    OpenBSD is officially supported on the following platforms. Official support means that the release install media is known to work, that the architecture can self-compile itself, and that most of the basic tools exist on the architecture. As well, releases always exist, and there are attempts to make snapshots available on a regular basis.

    alpha Digital Alpha-based systems
    amd64 AMD64-based systems
    armish ARM-based appliances (by Thecus, IO-DATA, and others)
    hp300 Hewlett-Packard HP 9000 series 300 and 400 workstations
    hppa Hewlett-Packard Precision Architecture (PA-RISC) systems
    i386 Standard PC and clones based on the Intel i386 architecture and compatible processors
    landisk IO-DATA Landisk systems (such as USL-5P) based on the SH4 cpu
    luna88k Omron LUNA-88K and LUNA-88K2 workstations
    mac68k Motorola 680x0-based Apple Macintosh with MMU
    macppc Apple New World PowerPC-based machines, from the iMac onwards
    mvme68k Motorola 680x0-based VME systems
    mvme88k Motorola 881x0-based VME systems
    sgi SGI MIPS-based workstations
    sparc Sun sun4, sun4c and sun4m class SPARC systems
    sparc64 Sun UltraSPARC systems
    vax Digital VAX-based systems
    zaurus Sharp Zaurus C3x00 PDAs

    Active porting efforts

    The following ports are not officially supported, and are not on par with supported platforms, but they are being worked on actively and may hopefully become supported platforms in the future. There is normally no official release for these architectures yet, but normally the in-progress source code is checked into the repository, and there is an attempt to start making snapshots.

    aviion Motorola M881x0-based Data General AViiON systems
    hppa64 Hewlett-Packard Precision Architecture (PA-RISC) 64 bit systems
    solbourne Solbourne ``IDT'' Sparc-like S3000, S4000 and S4000DX systems


    Et puis, la licence BSD est quand même reconnue libre par la FSF (http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#OriginalBSD(...) et donc le soucis des contributeurs n'est pas du à la licence, mais au niveau exigé par OpenBSD, et le manque d'intérêt. ou p'tet autre chose.

    c'est vendredi, j'ai marché dedans toussa, rien à foutre, déchainez-vous sur mon cadavre ;)