Il me semble que rawtherapee n'est pas "Libre" comme dis dans l'introduction. Il est "juste" gratuit. La décision sur ça licence ne semble pas encore complètement arrèter. http://www.rawtherapee.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=145 (Mai 2007) Hi Janne,
thank you for the polite mail. I get several rough mails from open source fans forcing me to switch to GPL ("you owe the open source community...", etc.).
There is only one reason to keep the source closed: I would like to earn some money with it (as I have put so much effort in it). I dont want to be a millionaire, I just want to live a bit easier (in the Hungarian circumstances).
I can promise the following two things:
a) If I can not devote time into the development, I will release the source code under GPL
b) If I collect a given amount of donation, I switch to GPL. (Now I am at 1.5%)
Best regards
Gabor
Bibble est pour l'instant celui que je trouve le plus efficace pour dévelloper des raw. Mais, il est dommage qu'il ne supporte pas le dng.
# Rawtherapee
Posté par Mailik . En réponse à la dépêche Linux et la photographie : état des lieux. Évalué à 6.
http://www.rawtherapee.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=145 (Mai 2007)
Hi Janne,
thank you for the polite mail. I get several rough mails from open source fans forcing me to switch to GPL ("you owe the open source community...", etc.).
There is only one reason to keep the source closed: I would like to earn some money with it (as I have put so much effort in it). I dont want to be a millionaire, I just want to live a bit easier (in the Hungarian circumstances).
I can promise the following two things:
a) If I can not devote time into the development, I will release the source code under GPL
b) If I collect a given amount of donation, I switch to GPL. (Now I am at 1.5%)
Best regards
Gabor
Bibble est pour l'instant celui que je trouve le plus efficace pour dévelloper des raw. Mais, il est dommage qu'il ne supporte pas le dng.