> Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP. The synthetic benchmarks such as Everest, PCMark05 or Sandra 2007 show that differences are non-existent on a component level.
Et la phrase avant dit :
"Windows Vista clearly is not a great new performer when it comes to executing single applications at maximum speed. Although we only looked at the 32-bit version of Windows Vista Enterprise, we do not expect the 64-bit edition to be faster (at least not with 32-bit applications)."
Et la phrase qui suit dit :
"We also found some programs that refused to work, and others that seem to cause problems at first but eventually ran properly."
Vista c'est la fête !!
ET ça continue
"There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance. Unreal Tournament 2004 and the professional graphics benchmarking suite SPECviewperf 9.03 suffered heavily from the lack of support for the OpenGL graphics library under Windows Vista. This is something we expected, and we clearly advise against replacing Windows XP with Windows Vista if you need to run professional graphics applications."
et encore
"We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP. There aren't newer versions available, and we don't see immediate solutions to this issue."
Leur conclusion Our hopes that Vista might be able to speed up applications are gone.
Allez, désespère pas, je suis sûr que si tu cherches bien, tu va finir par trouver un test complaisant avec Vista.
[^] # Re: Les windows fanboys errent sur ce journal !!
Posté par Christophe Merlet (site web personnel) . En réponse à la dépêche Comparatif Vista / Linux pour les performances des jeux. Évalué à 7.
Et la phrase avant dit :
"Windows Vista clearly is not a great new performer when it comes to executing single applications at maximum speed. Although we only looked at the 32-bit version of Windows Vista Enterprise, we do not expect the 64-bit edition to be faster (at least not with 32-bit applications)."
Et la phrase qui suit dit :
"We also found some programs that refused to work, and others that seem to cause problems at first but eventually ran properly."
Vista c'est la fête !!
ET ça continue
"There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance. Unreal Tournament 2004 and the professional graphics benchmarking suite SPECviewperf 9.03 suffered heavily from the lack of support for the OpenGL graphics library under Windows Vista. This is something we expected, and we clearly advise against replacing Windows XP with Windows Vista if you need to run professional graphics applications."
et encore
"We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP. There aren't newer versions available, and we don't see immediate solutions to this issue."
Leur conclusion
Our hopes that Vista might be able to speed up applications are gone.
Allez, désespère pas, je suis sûr que si tu cherches bien, tu va finir par trouver un test complaisant avec Vista.