• [^] # Re: autre alternative: icecream

    Posté par (site web personnel) . En réponse à la dépêche Compilation distribuée avec distcc / dmucs. Évalué à 2.

    icescream a ete developpe par un gourou KDE (Stephan Kulow) et marche super bien. Pas une seule reuninon KDE ou les developpeurs ne commencent pas par deployer du icescream partout. Je suis surpris de ne pas le voir cite.

    La page web: http://en.opensuse.org/Icecream
    (l'url du commentaire plus haut a une parenthese en trop)

    Petite copie de la partie interessante :
    ============================================
    I use distcc, why should I change?

    If you're sitting alone home and use your partner's computer to speed up your compilation and both these machines run the same Linux version, you're fine with distcc (as 95% of the users reading this chapter will be, I'm sure). But there are several situations, where distcc isn't the best choice:

    * you're changing compiler versions often and still want to speed up your compilation (see the ICECC_VERSION support)
    * you got some neat PPC laptop and want to use your wife's computer that only runs intel (see the cross compiler section)
    * you don't know what machines will be on-line at compile time.
    * most important: you're sitting in a office with several co-workers that do not like if you overload their workstations when they play doom (distcc doesn't have a scheduler)
    * you like nice compile monitors :)
    ============================================