Oué mais ils ont pas l'air de faire chier (ils peuvent pas trop s'ils veulent draguer les administrations avec ce format) :
extrait de la faq : http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/itpro/ecmafaq.mspx#E(...) Transferability of solutions and "GPL Compatibility"—If someone wants to build a solution that works with our formats, they are free to do so without worrying about patents or licenses associated with our formats. The concerns raised with our previous license about attribution and sub-licensing are now eliminated. Because the General Public License (GPL) is not universally interpreted the same way by everyone, we can’t give anyone a legal opinion about how our language relates to the GPL or other OSS licenses, but we believe we have removed the principal objections that people found with our prior license in a very simple and clear way.
[^] # Re: sans vouloir faire l'oiseau de mauvaise augure...
Posté par TImaniac (site web personnel) . En réponse à la dépêche Le format OpenDocument approuvé par l'ISO. Évalué à 1.
extrait de la faq :
http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/itpro/ecmafaq.mspx#E(...)
Transferability of solutions and "GPL Compatibility"—If someone wants to build a solution that works with our formats, they are free to do so without worrying about patents or licenses associated with our formats. The concerns raised with our previous license about attribution and sub-licensing are now eliminated. Because the General Public License (GPL) is not universally interpreted the same way by everyone, we can’t give anyone a legal opinion about how our language relates to the GPL or other OSS licenses, but we believe we have removed the principal objections that people found with our prior license in a very simple and clear way.