"Two arms of government have now spoken: the High Court of Australia, and a committee of the Parliament. Both have affirmed that copyright law must be balanced; that anti-circumvention laws should be matched to copyright rights, rather than overly extending them . How will the executive react?"
Le texte est plutot gros et en anglais, forcement... mais il y a un resume ici http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/ , on voit entre autre :
A recommendation on allowing interoperability that allows for reverse engineering of software for interoperability purposes, circumvention for software ‘installed involutnarily or without accceptance, or where the user has no awareness a TPM or no reasonable control over the presence of a TPM’
# Pendant ce temps la en Australie...
Posté par Ju. . En réponse à la dépêche Copie privée des DVD : la cour de cassation a tranché !. Évalué à 7.
Via boing boing :
http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/01/aussie_govt_report_o.ht(...)
"Two arms of government have now spoken: the High Court of Australia, and a committee of the Parliament. Both have affirmed that copyright law must be balanced; that anti-circumvention laws should be matched to copyright rights, rather than overly extending them . How will the executive react?"
Le texte est plutot gros et en anglais, forcement... mais il y a un resume ici http://www.lawfont.com/2006/03/02/tpm-inquiry-report-is-out/ , on voit entre autre :
A recommendation on allowing interoperability that allows for reverse engineering of software for interoperability purposes, circumvention for software ‘installed involutnarily or without accceptance, or where the user has no awareness a TPM or no reasonable control over the presence of a TPM’