Chose qui me paraitrait bizarre, c'est que ms redéveloppe entièrement tout alors qu'ils avaient une bonne machine virtuelle et des librairies sous la main...
Voici un extrait et un message, mais bon, rien de bien vérifiable, c'est pour ça que je demandais qu'on me corrige...
"The DotGNU Portable.NET guys have now taken the relatively obvious step of compiling C# to Java."
---
Strange. The core class library of .NET was originally written in Java (with a modified code-generation back-end). I still have Microsoft's source code on one of my removeable harddisk cartridges, dating from fall 1999, to prove it.
The plan was use the Java compiler and then come back later with a tool to translate Java source into C# (only then wasn't being called C# yet).
[^] # Re: Les langages et la jvm
Posté par echarp (site web personnel, Mastodon) . En réponse à la dépêche Havoc Pennington se pose des questions sur les langages du libre. Évalué à 1.
Là comme ça sans trop chercher j'ai trouvé ça ->
Will .NET Meet JVM Half-way?
http://developer.sys-con.com/viewitem.cfm?thread=7039(...)
Voici un extrait et un message, mais bon, rien de bien vérifiable, c'est pour ça que je demandais qu'on me corrige...
"The DotGNU Portable.NET guys have now taken the relatively obvious step of compiling C# to Java."
---
Strange. The core class library of .NET was originally written in Java (with a modified code-generation back-end). I still have Microsoft's source code on one of my removeable harddisk cartridges, dating from fall 1999, to prove it.
The plan was use the Java compiler and then come back later with a tool to translate Java source into C# (only then wasn't being called C# yet).
Roger V. IES