• [^] # Re: GNOME 2.6 beta 1

    Posté par . En réponse à la dépêche GNOME 2.6 beta 1. Évalué à 3.

    > 1/ le spatial view , en gros l horreur d ergonomie qu on pouvait trouver dans windows 95 ( jusqu a osr2 il me semble ) et dans les macos 6.x 7.x 8.x

    C'est pas tout à fait vrai.
    Il y a un thread sur fedora et le comportement pas défaut de Nautilus.
    Début du thread :
    http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2004-February/msg00(...)
    Dont le titre est "Lets take the worst of windows and make it the unchangeable default of linux" ...

    L'avis du développeur de Nautilus un peu plus loin dans le thread
    http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2004-February/msg01(...) :
    Can people please get a clue about this. I get pretty irritated when
    people think I implement a major change to a piece of software that I
    maintain "just to be like windows". Its fucking insulting, and is pretty
    close to just calling me a moron straight out.

    This change was not some random hare-brained copy-windows move. In fact,
    windows isn't even spatial at all (although some other oses are, like
    macos 9). The rationale and detailed discussions about the move to a
    spatial model and the pros and cons has been discussed in detail on the
    nautilus and gnome lists.

    The fact that you dislike a decision does not mean that the decision
    must have been stupid.