You have recently removed or defaced content from your posts. Please note that once you post a question or answer to this site, those posts become part of the collective efforts of others who have also contributed to that content. Posts that are potentially useful to others should not be removed except under extraordinary circumstances. Even if the post is no longer useful to the original author, that information is still beneficial to others who may run into similar problems in the future - this is the underlying philosophy of Stack Exchange.
Extensive deletions take a lot of effort to repair; please read "I’ve thought better of my question; can I delete it?" for possible alternatives. Because of the amount of disruption these incidents can cause, we have placed your account on hold for 30 days while we reach out to you to avoid any further misunderstandings. Once this matter has been resolved, your reputation score will be restored and your account will resume as normal.
If you have concerns about the OpenAI partnership, take it up with Stack Overflow, Inc. directly. Moderators are just volunteers and do not work for the company, and directing objections at us (or the community in general) isn't going to get you anywhere. Adding protest notices to your posts doesn't do anything aside pollute the currently human-driven Q&A. As an aside, most data on the public internet has likely already been scraped into training data - on Stack Overflow, this happened long before the OpenAI partnership. If you're concerned about how your content is used by AIs, it's far more impactful to stop producing more content anywhere on the internet, or continue fighting against its use on platforms known to get rid of genAI content.
de toute façon je n'ai pas l'intention de retourner sur leur site
"Ce n'est pas à l'état de tout savoir sur ses citoyens, mais au citoyen de tout savoir sur l'état."
[^] # Re: bonne idée
Posté par zurvan . En réponse au lien Stack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership. Évalué à 5.
ouais.
Leur réaction a été rapide :
de toute façon je n'ai pas l'intention de retourner sur leur site
"Ce n'est pas à l'état de tout savoir sur ses citoyens, mais au citoyen de tout savoir sur l'état."