• [^] # Re: btrfs, ce n'est à plus rien comprendre

    Posté par . En réponse à la dépêche Nouvelle version de Fedora dite 33. Évalué à 2.

    Alors, oui je sais, que fedora et centos/RHEL sont différent, [...]

    Tu aurais pu dire "fedora et centos et RHEL" :-) (certes, centos s'appuie sur les sources de RHEL, mais il y a une structure, une gouvernance et une communauté dédiées)

    mais c'est quand même lié.

    Pour illustrer les propos de Renault, je cite le FPL lors d'un AMA sur Reddit :

    I guess the major misconceptions relate to Red Hat and Fedora.

    First, Fedora is not just a beta for Red Hat Enterprise Linux. We do a lot of thing RHEL just plain isn't interested in, and set our own direction. As a very important downstream made by our major sponsor (including things like paying my salary), RHEL is a key stakeholder, but Fedora is so much more than that.

    Second and related, all of the crazy conspiracy theories about Red Hat either forcing Fedora to do some thing, or dominating other distros, or whatever — they're really silly. From an in-the-company perspective, there's plenty of politics and problems just as in any company, but most of it is 180° (or 270° or 32° or whatever) from the online imagination.

    And third, Fedora definitely isn't just Red Hatters. Of the core 300-or-so people in the project (out of 3000-or-so who contribute something every year), about 1⁄3 are Red Hatters and the rest from elsewhere.