Ici :
http://www.xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2003-March/000168.html
Plus loin il y a aussi un autre post intéressant :
http://www.xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2003-March/000181.html
The biggest roadblock to Linux being deployed on the desktop to displace
Microsoft software is the same thing it always has been - too MUCH choice.
Too many distributions, too many desktops, etc, etc. IT people don't want
it. Real, consumer end-users don't want it. I think it is hillarious to see
the OS-wars of old (e.g. a million Unix vendors -> OSF vs Unix
International; a bunch of desktop-like things -> Motif vs Open Look -> CDE
"unification") repeat itself yet again in the form of myriad distributions
and GNOME vs KDE.
I'm an OLD-time UNIX guy (started in 1981), and I moved to the Windows world
years ago because I saw this cycle repeating itself.
The only successful desktop UNIX implementation os OS.X, which, BTW, is
pretty closed without a lot of choice.
Personne ne va être d'accord, mais bon... :-)
# Réponse de Keith Packard
Posté par Guillaume Laurent . En réponse à la dépêche Keith Packard viré de XFree86. Évalué à 4.