Posté par benja .
En réponse au message Les langages par type..
Évalué à 0.
Dernière modification le 18 juillet 2016 à 01:08.
Arg busted! So ok I will from now on try to use the best tool for the job! So sad that Ocaml stays at the bottom of his chart, surely we shall send him to the language shootout http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/ for a more realistic chart (still doesn't account for that OCaml has the best ratio of simplicity*performance*reliability to time-to-code). It can also do web, system, distributed and graphics programming.
[^] # Re: Il y a des bon langages et des mauvais langages...
Posté par benja . En réponse au message Les langages par type.. Évalué à 0. Dernière modification le 18 juillet 2016 à 01:08.
Arg busted! So ok I will from now on try to use the best tool for the job! So sad that Ocaml stays at the bottom of his chart, surely we shall send him to the language shootout http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/ for a more realistic chart (still doesn't account for that OCaml has the best ratio of simplicity*performance*reliability to time-to-code). It can also do web, system, distributed and graphics programming.
http://i.imgur.com/Xy0RoUg.jpg <- best chart evoer!