• # Magic happens.

    Posté par (site web personnel) . En réponse au journal Douche froide pour la fusion. Évalué à 6.

    Merci pour l'info.
    Rapport "scientifique" ici.

    Ca sent quand même le fake. Quelques extraits de la conclusion du rapport :

    If nuclear transitions are prevalent in the burning process it is expected that radiation is emitted. It is remarkable that neither neutrons, charged particles nor gammas are observed from the E-cat reactor.
    Furthermore, the spent fuel was found inactive right after the E-Cat run was stopped. All imaginable nuclear reactions in the reactor should be followed by some radiation, and at least some of that radiation should penetrate the reactor wall and be possible to detect.

    Although we have good knowledge of the composition of the fuel we presently lack detailed information on the internal components of the reactor, and of the methods by which the reaction is primed. Since we are presently not in possession of this information, we think that any attempt to explain the E-Cat heating process would be too much hampered by the lack of this information, and thus we refrain from such discussions.

    In summary, the performance of the E-Cat reactor is remarkable. We have a device giving heat energy compatible with nuclear transformations, but it operates at low energy and gives neither nuclear radioactive waste nor emits radiation. From basic general knowledge in nuclear physics this should not be possible.

    En résumé : ils observent une production de chaleur, une modification (probable) de ce qu'il y avait à l'intérieur du bouzin, et ils ne voient aucune radiation.

    Bof. Tant que le dispositif n'est pas analysé en détail (pas vu où), je dis "fake".