That is certainly not true. With systemd we try to cover pretty much the same range as Linux itself does. While we care for desktop uses, we also care pretty much the same way for server uses, and embedded uses as well. You can bet that Red Hat wouldn't make it a core piece of RHEL7 if it wasn't the best option for managing services on servers.
People from numerous companies work on systemd. Car manufactureres build it into cars, Red Hat uses it for a server operating system, and GNOME uses many of its interfaces for improving the desktop. You find it in toys, in space telescopes, and in wind turbines.
Most features I most recently worked on are probably relevant primarily on servers, such as container support, resource management or the security features. We cover desktop systems pretty well already, and there are number of companies doing systemd development for embedded, some even offer consulting services in it.
"Quand certains râlent contre systemd, d'autres s'attaquent aux vrais problèmes." (merci Sinma !)
[^] # Re: Intérêt sur un serveur ?
Posté par xcomcmdr . En réponse à la dépêche systemd pour les administrateurs, parties 3, 4 et 5. Évalué à 4.
Oui, il n'y a que toi.
Va lire la série "systemd for administrators" (à ce jour, il y a 19 chapitres), et reviens.
"Quand certains râlent contre systemd, d'autres s'attaquent aux vrais problèmes." (merci Sinma !)