I am building regression model of cholesterol predicted by 4 dietary components. I want to check if the assumption of Homoscedasticity is satisfied. I plotted Residuals vs Laverage plot.
Unfortunatelly I cannot tell from this plot whether we can say Homoscedasticity or not... I know in the perfect scenario the residuals should be spread quite equally, though this data set is quite big (25 dietary components), therefore I was wondering where is the limit of deciding: we can/cannot day there is Homoscedasticity.
Maybe there are some other tests I can make to test that?
-
1$\begingroup$ You can plot the residuals against the fitted values, and you can also plot the residuals against the predictors. You're looking for relatively equal variance from a baseline throughout your plots. $\endgroup$Adrian Keister– Adrian Keister2022年03月21日 16:23:46 +00:00Commented Mar 21, 2022 at 16:23
-
$\begingroup$ The scale-location plot is ideal for what you are planning. $\endgroup$mdewey– mdewey2022年03月21日 17:27:24 +00:00Commented Mar 21, 2022 at 17:27
1 Answer 1
Scale-Location is used to check the homoscedasticity of residuals (equal variance of residuals). If the residuals are spread randomly and the see a horizontal line with equally (randomly) spread points, then the assumption is fulfilled. Check the link: https://bookdown.org/jimr1603/Intermediate_R_-_R_for_Survey_Analysis/testing-regression-assumptions.html
-
1$\begingroup$ What you mean is better phrased as points equally scattered around a horizontal line. The SEE itself is a constant and itself can only plot as horizontal. $\endgroup$Nick Cox– Nick Cox2025年03月20日 07:04:02 +00:00Commented Mar 20 at 7:04
Explore related questions
See similar questions with these tags.