Skip to main content
Open Source

Questions tagged [exceptions]

For questions about exceptions to open source licenses

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
7 votes
4 answers
1k views

I want to release the source code of a profiling/performance analysis library for a platform that doesn't really support dynamic linking. If the library code is modified or used in a tool/library that ...
4 votes
1 answer
300 views

The protobuf license at https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/e34bb0dd09485741852291adac788216bceb2b93/LICENSE is essentially a BSD-3-Clause License but with an added exception of Code ...
8 votes
3 answers
565 views

Selling exceptions to FOSS licenses (e.g., like Qt) is okay, but changing a project's license from a FOSS one to a proprietary one (e.g., like Redis, MongoDB, and HashiCorp) is bad. Given a project ...
3 votes
0 answers
68 views

I have found an error in the text of the LGPL 3.0 linking exception, as follows: As a special exception ...providing any... Minimal Application Code... There is no "Minimal Application Code" in LGPL ...
Frankus's user avatar
  • 31
7 votes
2 answers
143 views

I looked more closely at this FAQ entry on GPL 3.0 Interface Exception and I am a bit confused with the bolded text. The goal of this exception is to be able to link independent modules, licensed ...
5 votes
1 answer
513 views

Let's say library P is licensed under GPLv2 with the GCC Runtime Library Exception 2.0 or another similar exception like the Classpath Exception. Proprietary software K uses library P. This is allowed ...
2 votes
1 answer
104 views

After reading the ABNF in the SPDX License Expressions specification I don't see a way to apply multiple exceptions to a single license. The only way I can think of would be License-A WITH Exception-B ...
Captain Man's user avatar
5 votes
3 answers
4k views

I believe it is fairly well understood that you cannot link proprietary code to code licensed under the GPL because you're creating a derivative work and have to license it all under the GPL. ...
10 votes
1 answer
1k views

According to both the Apache Software Foundation (Apache) and Free Software Foundation (FSF), the Apache License 2.0 is not compatible with GNU General Public License 2.0. Despite [Apache's] best ...
1 vote
1 answer
86 views

This Creative Commons Wiki page says of the embedded license: "you might specify what 'work' you're talking about" and gives the example of prefacing the license with "Except where ...
3 votes
1 answer
626 views

The Apache License v2.0 is incompatible with GPLv2. Instead of dual-licensing or using the LLVM Exceptions, I am thinking of defining an exception to the Apache license that is similar to what is ...
3 votes
1 answer
562 views

The OCaml compiler and many other third-party OCaml libraries are licensed under the LGPL with a linking exception: As a special exception to the GNU Lesser General Public License, you may link, ...
Flux's user avatar
  • 793
8 votes
3 answers
2k views

As an individual freelancer, I'm writing some code for my customer's commercial closed-source project. The customer don't mind me to open-source this code, but they would like the code to be available ...
gavv's user avatar
  • 446
3 votes
1 answer
376 views

I'm currently working on an open source video game and would like to mix licenses within the core project. I would like to: License all source code I write as AGPLv3. License all original assets I ...
2 votes
1 answer
134 views

Suppose there exists a software library libfoo distributed under the terms of a hypothetical license we will here call The Foo License (TFL). The terms of TFL are identical to those of the 3-clause ...

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /