public-owl-dev@w3.org from October to December 2007 by date

Saturday, 22 December 2007

JOB: R&D Position @ Clark & Parsia LLC Kendall Clark
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Pat Hayes
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Michael Schneider

Friday, 21 December 2007

[OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Pat Hayes
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Jeremy Carroll
[OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Michael Schneider

Thursday, 20 December 2007

CFP: Fifth International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems Michael Gruninger
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Pat Hayes
European Master in Computational Logic - scholarships for non-European and European students Enrico Franconi
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jeremy Carroll
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider
Re: Neophyte question - modelling Alpha Taxonomies in RDF and Owl Chris Mungall

Wednesday, 19 December 2007

Neophyte question - modelling Alpha Taxonomies in RDF and Owl Christopher Rose
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Michael Schneider
Protege-OWL Short Course, March 24-26, 2008, Stanford University Jennifer Vendetti
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 18 December 2007

REMAINDER: Handbook of Research on Emerging Rule-Based Languages and Technologies Adrian Giurca

Monday, 17 December 2007

RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Michael Schneider
Please avoid unnecessary CCs Ian Horrocks
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jeremy Carroll
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jeremy Carroll
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Bijan Parsia
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Michael Schneider
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Bijan Parsia
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jeremy Carroll
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Matthew Pocock
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler
ESWC 2008 2nd Call for System Demonstrations Joerg Hoffmann
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] Pat Hayes
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] Alan Ruttenberg
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] Pat Hayes

Sunday, 16 December 2007

Friday, 14 December 2007

IEEE Policy 2008 -- DEADLINE EXTENDED Alessandra Toninelli

Thursday, 13 December 2007

[OWLWG-COMMENT] QCR problem in OWL 1.1 Full - action ?? from F2F Michael Schneider
RE: Annotations with OWL Ibach, Brandon L
Annotations with OWL james.lapalme@videotron.ca

Tuesday, 11 December 2007

RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jim Hendler
CFP SOCASE @ AAMAS 2008 Ryszard Kowalczyk
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jeremy Carroll
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jim Hendler

Monday, 10 December 2007

Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Alan Ruttenberg
Cfp: ESWC 2008 Ph.D. Symposium Philippe Cudre-Mauroux
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 9 December 2007

RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider

Saturday, 8 December 2007

RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Hans Teijgeler
[OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider

Friday, 7 December 2007

OWLED, Washington, DC, April 2008 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 2 December 2007

Re: problems with imports Bill Bug
Re: OWL 1.1... does this make sense Matthew Pocock
Re: problems with imports Bijan Parsia

Saturday, 1 December 2007

problems with imports Timothy Redmond

Sunday, 2 December 2007

Re: OWL 1.1... does this make sense james.lapalme@videotron.ca

Saturday, 1 December 2007

Re: OWL 1.1... does this make sense Matthew Pocock
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Michael Schneider

Friday, 30 November 2007

Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Pat Hayes
Final CFP: 5th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2008) Sean Bechhofer
OWL 1.1... does this make sense james.lapalme@videotron.ca
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Jeremy Carroll
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 29 November 2007

Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Pat Hayes
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Jeremy Carroll
KR08 Doctoral Consortium, Call for Applications Carsten Lutz

Wednesday, 28 November 2007

Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Alan Ruttenberg
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Pat Hayes
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 27 November 2007

Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Pat Hayes
[OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Michael Schneider

Monday, 26 November 2007

ESWC 2008: Final Call for Workshop Proposals Heiner Stuckenschmidt

Sunday, 25 November 2007

Re: OWL Custom display Bijan Parsia
OWL Custom display james.lapalme@videotron.ca

Saturday, 24 November 2007

Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-27 and "antisymmetric" vs. "asymmetric" object properties Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 23 November 2007

Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Pat Hayes

Thursday, 22 November 2007

[OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Michael Schneider
Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Jeremy Carroll
Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Dan Brickley
Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 21 November 2007

RE: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Michael Schneider
Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Jeremy Carroll
Call for Papers: WaGe08 - Workflow Management and Applications in Grid Environments Jinjun Chen

Tuesday, 20 November 2007

[OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-27 and "antisymmetric" vs. "asymmetric" object properties Michael Schneider

Wednesday, 14 November 2007

IEEE Policy 2008 -- Call for Papers Alessandra Toninelli
2nd CFP: European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2008) Sean Bechhofer

Tuesday, 13 November 2007

Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? Alan Ruttenberg

Monday, 12 November 2007

RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? Pat Hayes
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Defining the universal property in OWL-1.1 Michael Schneider
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? Michael Schneider

Sunday, 11 November 2007

Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Defining the universal property in OWL-1.1 Carsten Lutz

Saturday, 10 November 2007

Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? Pat Hayes
[OWLWG-COMMENT] Defining the universal property in OWL-1.1 Michael Schneider
[OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? Michael Schneider

Tuesday, 6 November 2007

Re: What about sub property chains for datatype properties? (ISSUE-8) Ian Horrocks
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Pat Hayes

Monday, 5 November 2007

First CfP of ANSyM2008: Adaptive Networked Systems and Media Mircea Diaconescu

Tuesday, 6 November 2007

Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider

Monday, 5 November 2007

Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Pat Hayes
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Bijan Parsia
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider
RE: What about sub property chains for datatype properties? (ISSUE-8) Michael Schneider
Re: What about sub property chains for datatype properties? (ISSUE-8) Uli Sattler
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: bags of axioms Bijan Parsia
Re: bags of axioms Matthew Pocock
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Danny Ayers
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider

Sunday, 4 November 2007

Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Evren Sirin

Friday, 2 November 2007

RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Evren Sirin

Thursday, 1 November 2007

Re: bags of axioms Pat Hayes
DL08 Call for Papers Carsten Lutz
Re: bags of axioms Bijan Parsia
Re: bags of axioms Matthew Pocock
[OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider

Wednesday, 31 October 2007

Langtech 2008 LangTech2008 secretariat
Re: bags of axioms Pat Hayes
Re: bags of axioms Danny Ayers
bags of axioms Matthew Pocock

Tuesday, 30 October 2007

Re: CIFP Bijan Parsia
CIFP james.lapalme@videotron.ca

Monday, 29 October 2007

ESWC 2008: 2nd Call for Workshop Proposals Heiner Stuckenschmidt

Friday, 26 October 2007

Call for Participation: Workshop on Privacy Enforcement and Accountability with Semantics, at ISWC'07 & ASWC'07 Daniel Olmedilla

Thursday, 25 October 2007

RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider
ESWC 2008 Call for Panel Proposals Raphaël Troncy
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Giorgos Stoilos

Wednesday, 24 October 2007

ESWC 2008 Call for Panel Proposals Raphaël Troncy
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Jeremy Carroll
RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Jeremy Carroll
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 23 October 2007

RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes
RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes
Re: a comment on geography (was Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full) Pat Hayes
Re: a comment on geography Frank Manola
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: a comment on geography Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider
RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Jeremy Carroll
Re: a comment on geography (was Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full) Jeremy Carroll
a comment on geography (was Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Alan Ruttenberg

Monday, 22 October 2007

Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes
Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider

Friday, 19 October 2007

Axiom closures, and the best place for the "Non-Structural Restrictions" chapter Michael Schneider

Thursday, 18 October 2007

RE: Representing anonymous individual in SemWeb Best Practice documents Benedicto Rodriguez
RE: (Object|Data)Property axioms missing in semantics document Boris Motik
RE: (Object|Data)Property axioms missing in semantics document Michael Schneider
(Object|Data)Property axioms missing in semantics document Michael Schneider

Wednesday, 17 October 2007

Re: Representing anonymous individual in SemWeb Best Practice documents Ian Horrocks
RE: Role of 'public-webont-comments'? [WAS: Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict?] Michael Schneider
Re: Role of 'public-webont-comments'? [WAS: Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict?] Bijan Parsia
Role of 'public-webont-comments'? [WAS: Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict?] Michael Schneider
RE: Representing anonymous individual in SemWeb Best Practice documents Ibach, Brandon L

Tuesday, 16 October 2007

Re: Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict? Ian Horrocks
Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict? Michael Schneider

Monday, 15 October 2007

RE: A perfect brother [WAS: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1] Michael Schneider
Re: A perfect brother [WAS: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1] Ian Horrocks
A perfect brother [WAS: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1] Michael Schneider

Sunday, 14 October 2007

Representing anonymous individual in SemWeb Best Practice documents Benedicto Rodriguez

Friday, 12 October 2007

RE: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Michael Schneider
Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Ulrike Sattler
Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Michael Schneider

Thursday, 11 October 2007

RE: Is OWL-1.1 issue 14 still an issue? Michael Schneider
Re: typo in OWL 1.1 syntax Bijan Parsia
Re: Is OWL-1.1 issue 14 still an issue? Bijan Parsia
Re: typo in OWL 1.1 syntax Ian Horrocks
Is OWL-1.1 issue 14 still an issue? Michael Schneider
typo in OWL 1.1 syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 9 October 2007

RE: Inferring Properties based on Types John McClure
RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider

Monday, 8 October 2007

Re: Inferring Properties based on Types Ian Horrocks

Tuesday, 9 October 2007

RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider

Monday, 8 October 2007

RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Swanson, Tim
RE: Inferring Properties based on Types John McClure
RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Swanson, Tim
RE: Inferring Properties based on Types John McClure
RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Swanson, Tim

Sunday, 7 October 2007

RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider

Saturday, 6 October 2007

Re: Inferring Properties based on Types Ian Horrocks

Friday, 5 October 2007

RE: Unclear about Nonstructural Restriction [WAS: Inferring Properties based on Types] Michael Schneider
Re: Unclear about Nonstructural Restriction [WAS: Inferring Properties based on Types] Evren Sirin
IEEE TASE special issue on "Scientific Workflow Management and Applications" Jinjun Chen
Unclear about Nonstructural Restriction [WAS: Inferring Properties based on Types] Michael Schneider

Thursday, 4 October 2007

FW: [ontolog-invitation] Two Sessions on "Distributed Collaboration in Ontology Development" coming up - Oct. 4 & 11, 2007 Luciano, Joanne S.
Wrong axiom names in "Nonstructural" chapter of OWL-1.1 draft Michael Schneider
Re: bnodes Reto Bachmann-Gmür

Wednesday, 3 October 2007

Bnodes redux. (was: Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are) Pat Hayes
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Matthew Pocock
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Phillip Lord
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Matthew Pocock
[TF:Rules][TF:UnO][TF:RA] Blog posts of interest Bijan Parsia
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are ewallace@cme.nist.gov
Re: Degree of acceptance of BFO Phillip Lord
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia
Re: bnodes Pierre-Antoine Champin
RE: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Michael Schneider
Re: bnodes Jeremy Carroll
RE: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Obrst, Leo J.

Tuesday, 2 October 2007

Re: bnodes Bijan Parsia
Re: bnodes Chimezie Ogbuji
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Pat Hayes
RE: Degree of acceptance of BFO Gerd Wagner
Re: bnodes Sandro Hawke
Re: bnodes Reto Bachmann-Gmür
Re: bnodes Reto Bachmann-Gmür
Re: Is the ontology structure stored seamlessly with its data? Ivan Herman
Re: Degree of acceptance of BFO Alan Ruttenberg
Re: bnodes Bijan Parsia
Re: Degree of acceptance of BFO Phillip Lord
Re: bnodes Sandro Hawke
Degree of acceptance of BFO Emanuele D'Arrigo
RE: Is the ontology structure stored seamlessly with its data? T.Heath
Re: bnodes Bijan Parsia
What about sub property chains for datatype properties? Michael Schneider
Re: bnodes Reto Bachmann-Gmür
Re: bnodes Bijan Parsia
bnodes Reto Bachmann-Gmür
RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider

Monday, 1 October 2007

RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider
Re: Inferring Properties based on Types Evren Sirin
Re: Is the ontology structure stored seamlessly with its data? Tim Berners-Lee
RE: Is the ontology structure stored seamlessly with its data? Luciano, Joanne S.
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Dan Brickley
RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Robert Stevens
Re: On classes and property permissions Emanuele D'Arrigo
Re: Inferring Properties based on Types Dmitry Tsarkov
Re: Inferring Properties based on Types Evren Sirin
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Matthew Pocock
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Danny Ayers
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia

Last message date: Monday, 24 December 2007 02:50:54 UTC