JOB: R&D Position @ Clark & Parsia LLC Kendall Clark (Saturday, 22 December)
[OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Michael Schneider (Friday, 21 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 21 December)
- [OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Pat Hayes (Friday, 21 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Michael Schneider (Saturday, 22 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Pat Hayes (Saturday, 22 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning Michael Schneider (Saturday, 22 December)
CFP: Fifth International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems Michael Gruninger (Thursday, 20 December)
European Master in Computational Logic - scholarships for non-European and European students Enrico Franconi (Thursday, 20 December)
Neophyte question - modelling Alpha Taxonomies in RDF and Owl Christopher Rose (Wednesday, 19 December)
- Re: Neophyte question - modelling Alpha Taxonomies in RDF and Owl Chris Mungall (Thursday, 20 December)
Protege-OWL Short Course, March 24-26, 2008, Stanford University Jennifer Vendetti (Wednesday, 19 December)
RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 19 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Michael Schneider (Wednesday, 19 December)
Please avoid unnecessary CCs Ian Horrocks (Monday, 17 December)
ESWC 2008 2nd Call for System Demonstrations Joerg Hoffmann (Monday, 17 December)
- REMAINDER: Handbook of Research on Emerging Rule-Based Languages and Technologies Adrian Giurca (Tuesday, 18 December)
[OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] Michael Schneider (Sunday, 16 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] Jim Hendler (Sunday, 16 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] Pat Hayes (Sunday, 16 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] Alan Ruttenberg (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] Pat Hayes (Monday, 17 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Michael Schneider (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] Alan Ruttenberg (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] Pat Hayes (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Matthew Pocock (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler (Monday, 17 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Michael Schneider (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Bijan Parsia (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Matthew Pocock (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Bijan Parsia (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full Jim Hendler (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] Pat Hayes (Sunday, 16 December)
cfp: Role of Services, Ontologies, and Context in Mobile Environments (RoSOC-M '08), April 27, 2008, Beijing, China RoSOC-M Workshop (Sunday, 16 December)
IEEE Policy 2008 -- DEADLINE EXTENDED Alessandra Toninelli (Friday, 14 December)
[OWLWG-COMMENT] QCR problem in OWL 1.1 Full - action ?? from F2F Michael Schneider (Thursday, 13 December)
Annotations with OWL james.lapalme@videotron.ca (Thursday, 13 December)
- RE: Annotations with OWL Ibach, Brandon L (Thursday, 13 December)
CFP SOCASE @ AAMAS 2008 Ryszard Kowalczyk (Tuesday, 11 December)
Cfp: ESWC 2008 Ph.D. Symposium Philippe Cudre-Mauroux (Monday, 10 December)
[OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider (Saturday, 8 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Hans Teijgeler (Saturday, 8 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider (Sunday, 9 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jeremy Carroll (Monday, 10 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider (Sunday, 9 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Alan Ruttenberg (Monday, 10 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jim Hendler (Tuesday, 11 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 11 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jim Hendler (Tuesday, 11 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 11 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jim Hendler (Tuesday, 11 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 11 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 11 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 11 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Michael Schneider (Thursday, 20 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 20 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 20 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Pat Hayes (Thursday, 20 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 20 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 20 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) Jim Hendler (Tuesday, 11 December)
OWLED, Washington, DC, April 2008 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 7 December)
problems with imports Timothy Redmond (Saturday, 1 December)
- Re: problems with imports Bijan Parsia (Sunday, 2 December)
- Re: problems with imports Bill Bug (Sunday, 2 December)
Final CFP: 5th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2008) Sean Bechhofer (Friday, 30 November)
OWL 1.1... does this make sense james.lapalme@videotron.ca (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: OWL 1.1... does this make sense Matthew Pocock (Saturday, 1 December)
- Re: OWL 1.1... does this make sense james.lapalme@videotron.ca (Sunday, 2 December)
- Re: OWL 1.1... does this make sense Matthew Pocock (Sunday, 2 December)
- Re: OWL 1.1... does this make sense james.lapalme@videotron.ca (Sunday, 2 December)
KR08 Doctoral Consortium, Call for Applications Carsten Lutz (Thursday, 29 November)
[OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Alan Ruttenberg (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 29 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Pat Hayes (Thursday, 29 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Pat Hayes (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Pat Hayes (Thursday, 29 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 29 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Michael Schneider (Saturday, 1 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 28 November)
ESWC 2008: Final Call for Workshop Proposals Heiner Stuckenschmidt (Monday, 26 November)
OWL Custom display james.lapalme@videotron.ca (Sunday, 25 November)
- Re: OWL Custom display Bijan Parsia (Sunday, 25 November)
[OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise Michael Schneider (Thursday, 22 November)
Call for Papers: WaGe08 - Workflow Management and Applications in Grid Environments Jinjun Chen (Wednesday, 21 November)
[OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-27 and "antisymmetric" vs. "asymmetric" object properties Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 20 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-27 and "antisymmetric" vs. "asymmetric" object properties Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Saturday, 24 November)
IEEE Policy 2008 -- Call for Papers Alessandra Toninelli (Wednesday, 14 November)
2nd CFP: European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2008) Sean Bechhofer (Wednesday, 14 November)
[OWLWG-COMMENT] Defining the universal property in OWL-1.1 Michael Schneider (Saturday, 10 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Defining the universal property in OWL-1.1 Carsten Lutz (Sunday, 11 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Defining the universal property in OWL-1.1 Michael Schneider (Monday, 12 November)
[OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? Michael Schneider (Saturday, 10 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? Pat Hayes (Saturday, 10 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? Michael Schneider (Monday, 12 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? Pat Hayes (Monday, 12 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? Alan Ruttenberg (Tuesday, 13 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? Pat Hayes (Monday, 12 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? Michael Schneider (Monday, 12 November)
First CfP of ANSyM2008: Adaptive Networked Systems and Media Mircea Diaconescu (Monday, 5 November)
DL08 Call for Papers Carsten Lutz (Thursday, 1 November)
[OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider (Thursday, 1 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Evren Sirin (Friday, 2 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider (Friday, 2 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Evren Sirin (Sunday, 4 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Bijan Parsia (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Pat Hayes (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 6 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 6 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Pat Hayes (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Bijan Parsia (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Evren Sirin (Sunday, 4 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Sunday, 4 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider (Friday, 2 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider (Friday, 2 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Sunday, 4 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 6 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Danny Ayers (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case Michael Schneider (Monday, 5 November)
Langtech 2008 LangTech2008 secretariat (Wednesday, 31 October)
bags of axioms Matthew Pocock (Wednesday, 31 October)
- Re: bags of axioms Danny Ayers (Wednesday, 31 October)
- Re: bags of axioms Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 31 October)
- Re: bags of axioms Matthew Pocock (Thursday, 1 November)
- Re: bags of axioms Pat Hayes (Thursday, 1 November)
- Re: bags of axioms Matthew Pocock (Thursday, 1 November)
- Re: bags of axioms Bijan Parsia (Thursday, 1 November)
- Re: bags of axioms Matthew Pocock (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: bags of axioms Bijan Parsia (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: bags of axioms Matthew Pocock (Monday, 5 November)
CIFP james.lapalme@videotron.ca (Tuesday, 30 October)
- Re: CIFP Bijan Parsia (Tuesday, 30 October)
ESWC 2008: 2nd Call for Workshop Proposals Heiner Stuckenschmidt (Monday, 29 October)
Call for Participation: Workshop on Privacy Enforcement and Accountability with Semantics, at ISWC'07 & ASWC'07 Daniel Olmedilla (Friday, 26 October)
ESWC 2008 Call for Panel Proposals Raphaël Troncy (Thursday, 25 October)
ESWC 2008 Call for Panel Proposals Raphaël Troncy (Wednesday, 24 October)
Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider (Monday, 22 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes (Monday, 22 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 22 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 23 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 23 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 23 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 23 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider (Wednesday, 24 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 24 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Giorgos Stoilos (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 25 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 25 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 23 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 24 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 24 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Alan Ruttenberg (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 October)
- a comment on geography (was Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: a comment on geography (was Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full) Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: a comment on geography Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: a comment on geography Frank Manola (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: a comment on geography Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: a comment on geography (was Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full) Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: a comment on geography (was Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full) Jeremy Carroll (Tuesday, 23 October)
(Object|Data)Property axioms missing in semantics document Michael Schneider (Thursday, 18 October)
- RE: (Object|Data)Property axioms missing in semantics document Boris Motik (Thursday, 18 October)
- RE: (Object|Data)Property axioms missing in semantics document Michael Schneider (Thursday, 18 October)
Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict? Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 16 October)
- Re: Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict? Ian Horrocks (Tuesday, 16 October)
- Role of 'public-webont-comments'? [WAS: Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict?] Michael Schneider (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: Role of 'public-webont-comments'? [WAS: Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict?] Bijan Parsia (Wednesday, 17 October)
- RE: Role of 'public-webont-comments'? [WAS: Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict?] Michael Schneider (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: Role of 'public-webont-comments'? [WAS: Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict?] Bijan Parsia (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Role of 'public-webont-comments'? [WAS: Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict?] Michael Schneider (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Axiom closures, and the best place for the "Non-Structural Restrictions" chapter Michael Schneider (Friday, 19 October)
Representing anonymous individual in SemWeb Best Practice documents Benedicto Rodriguez (Sunday, 14 October)
- RE: Representing anonymous individual in SemWeb Best Practice documents Ibach, Brandon L (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: Representing anonymous individual in SemWeb Best Practice documents Ian Horrocks (Wednesday, 17 October)
- RE: Representing anonymous individual in SemWeb Best Practice documents Benedicto Rodriguez (Thursday, 18 October)
- Re: Representing anonymous individual in SemWeb Best Practice documents Ian Horrocks (Wednesday, 17 October)
Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Michael Schneider (Friday, 12 October)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Ulrike Sattler (Friday, 12 October)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 12 October)
- RE: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Michael Schneider (Friday, 12 October)
- A perfect brother [WAS: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1] Michael Schneider (Monday, 15 October)
- Re: A perfect brother [WAS: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1] Ian Horrocks (Monday, 15 October)
- RE: A perfect brother [WAS: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1] Michael Schneider (Monday, 15 October)
- Re: A perfect brother [WAS: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1] Ian Horrocks (Monday, 15 October)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 21 November)
- RE: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Michael Schneider (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Pat Hayes (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Dan Brickley (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Pat Hayes (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Jeremy Carroll (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 Dan Brickley (Thursday, 22 November)
Is OWL-1.1 issue 14 still an issue? Michael Schneider (Thursday, 11 October)
- Re: Is OWL-1.1 issue 14 still an issue? Bijan Parsia (Thursday, 11 October)
- RE: Is OWL-1.1 issue 14 still an issue? Michael Schneider (Thursday, 11 October)
typo in OWL 1.1 syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 11 October)
- Re: typo in OWL 1.1 syntax Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 11 October)
- Re: typo in OWL 1.1 syntax Bijan Parsia (Thursday, 11 October)
IEEE TASE special issue on "Scientific Workflow Management and Applications" Jinjun Chen (Friday, 5 October)
FW: [ontolog-invitation] Two Sessions on "Distributed Collaboration in Ontology Development" coming up - Oct. 4 & 11, 2007 Luciano, Joanne S. (Thursday, 4 October)
Wrong axiom names in "Nonstructural" chapter of OWL-1.1 draft Michael Schneider (Thursday, 4 October)
[TF:Rules][TF:UnO][TF:RA] Blog posts of interest Bijan Parsia (Wednesday, 3 October)
Degree of acceptance of BFO Emanuele D'Arrigo (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: Degree of acceptance of BFO Phillip Lord (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: Degree of acceptance of BFO Alan Ruttenberg (Tuesday, 2 October)
- RE: Degree of acceptance of BFO Gerd Wagner (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: Degree of acceptance of BFO Phillip Lord (Wednesday, 3 October)
What about sub property chains for datatype properties? Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: What about sub property chains for datatype properties? (ISSUE-8) Uli Sattler (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: What about sub property chains for datatype properties? (ISSUE-8) Michael Schneider (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: What about sub property chains for datatype properties? (ISSUE-8) Ian Horrocks (Tuesday, 6 November)
bnodes Reto Bachmann-Gmür (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Bijan Parsia (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Reto Bachmann-Gmür (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Bijan Parsia (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Sandro Hawke (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Bijan Parsia (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Reto Bachmann-Gmür (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Sandro Hawke (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Reto Bachmann-Gmür (Thursday, 4 October)
- Re: bnodes Sandro Hawke (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Reto Bachmann-Gmür (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Sandro Hawke (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Bijan Parsia (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Chimezie Ogbuji (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Bijan Parsia (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: bnodes Pierre-Antoine Champin (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: bnodes Jeremy Carroll (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: bnodes Bijan Parsia (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes Reto Bachmann-Gmür (Tuesday, 2 October)
RE: Is the ontology structure stored seamlessly with its data? Luciano, Joanne S. (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: Is the ontology structure stored seamlessly with its data? Tim Berners-Lee (Monday, 1 October)
- RE: Is the ontology structure stored seamlessly with its data? T.Heath (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: Is the ontology structure stored seamlessly with its data? Ivan Herman (Tuesday, 2 October)
Re: On classes and property permissions Emanuele D'Arrigo (Monday, 1 October)
Re: Inferring Properties based on Types Evren Sirin (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: Inferring Properties based on Types Dmitry Tsarkov (Monday, 1 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: Inferring Properties based on Types Evren Sirin (Monday, 1 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider (Monday, 1 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: Inferring Properties based on Types Ian Horrocks (Saturday, 6 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider (Sunday, 7 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Swanson, Tim (Monday, 8 October)
- Re: Inferring Properties based on Types Ian Horrocks (Monday, 8 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 9 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider (Sunday, 7 October)
- Re: Inferring Properties based on Types Ian Horrocks (Saturday, 6 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types John McClure (Monday, 8 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Swanson, Tim (Monday, 8 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types John McClure (Monday, 8 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Swanson, Tim (Monday, 8 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider (Tuesday, 9 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types John McClure (Tuesday, 9 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types John McClure (Monday, 8 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Swanson, Tim (Monday, 8 October)
- Re: Inferring Properties based on Types Evren Sirin (Monday, 1 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types Michael Schneider (Monday, 1 October)
- Unclear about Nonstructural Restriction [WAS: Inferring Properties based on Types] Michael Schneider (Friday, 5 October)
- Re: Unclear about Nonstructural Restriction [WAS: Inferring Properties based on Types] Evren Sirin (Friday, 5 October)
- RE: Unclear about Nonstructural Restriction [WAS: Inferring Properties based on Types] Michael Schneider (Friday, 5 October)
- Re: Unclear about Nonstructural Restriction [WAS: Inferring Properties based on Types] Evren Sirin (Friday, 5 October)
Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Danny Ayers (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Dan Brickley (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 2 October)
- RE: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Obrst, Leo J. (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Bnodes redux. (was: Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are) Pat Hayes (Wednesday, 3 October)
- RE: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Obrst, Leo J. (Wednesday, 3 October)
- RE: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Michael Schneider (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Dan Brickley (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Robert Stevens (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Matthew Pocock (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Phillip Lord (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Matthew Pocock (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are Bijan Parsia (Wednesday, 3 October)
Last message date: Monday, 24 December 2007 02:50:54 UTC