Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

feat: add rns registry contract address #3730

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
jonathansmirnoff wants to merge 1 commit into wevm:main
base: main
Choose a base branch
Loading
from jonathansmirnoff:feat/add-rootstock-rns-contract

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

@jonathansmirnoff jonathansmirnoff commented Jun 12, 2025

PR Description

This PR adds the RNS Registry contract address for Rootstock Mainnet.

By including this address, Rootstock becomes compatible with ENS-related operations offered by the wagmi library. Since RNS is protocol-compatible with ENS, developers will now be able to use standard ENS methods (e.g., getEnsAddress, resolveName, etc.) when interacting with .rsk domains on Rootstock.

This is an important step toward improving interoperability and enhancing the developer experience across the Rootstock ecosystem.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Someone is attempting to deploy a commit to the Wevm Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jun 12, 2025
edited
Loading

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: d071742

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
viem Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@jonathansmirnoff jonathansmirnoff force-pushed the feat/add-rootstock-rns-contract branch 2 times, most recently from 2b07bcf to 9efc073 Compare June 12, 2025 21:41
Copy link
Member

jxom commented Jun 13, 2025

Thanks for the PR. Is this address listed on the official docs anywhere?

url: 'https://explorer.rsk.co',
},
},
contracts: {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need to also add ensTld to this chain.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@jonathansmirnoff jonathansmirnoff Jun 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added

Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the PR. Is this address listed on the official docs anywhere?

Yes, you can check in the official rns-registry package: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@rsksmart/rns-registry

Deployments:
RSK Mainnet: [0xcb868aeabd31e2b66f74e9a55cf064abb31a4ad5](https://explorer.rsk.co/address/0xcb868aeabd31e2b66f74e9a55cf064abb31a4ad5)
RSK Testnet: [0x7d284aaac6e925aad802a53c0c69efe3764597b8](https://explorer.testnet.rsk.co/address/0x7d284aaac6e925aad802a53c0c69efe3764597b8)

Copy link
Contributor Author

@jxom! Did you have the chance to review the PR?

Copy link
Member

jxom commented Jun 17, 2025

Not yet.

Copy link
Member

jxom commented Jul 18, 2025

Why is the repository archived? https://github.com/rnsdomains/rns-registry

Copy link
Contributor Author

Why is the repository archived? https://github.com/rnsdomains/rns-registry

The repository is archived because it is now in read-only mode—the protocol itself is fully deployed and actively used on the Rootstock blockchain. RNS protocol continues to be a foundational component of the Rootstock ecosystem.

📌 Where is RNS actively used?

Here are several examples that demonstrate the ongoing relevance and integration of the RNS protocol:

Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @jxom! Did you have the chance to review? Do you need more information?

@tmm tmm force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from 129b947 to 9ad3509 Compare September 19, 2025 19:48
@jxom jxom force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from d78cf00 to b31cf2a Compare October 7, 2025 01:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jxom jxom jxom left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /