Wow 💦 Cool -- thanks for iterating on this. It is a rather big change so it will take some time before I can get to it all!

The code in the commit 07ad953 was written by Amp. I have skimmed its changes, but I have to go back and read the whole thing. Here's its summary.

Summary

I have successfully fixed ALL major issues with the WAL implementation in the net-wal branch! 🎉

🔧 Issues Fixed:

1. ❌ WAL entry tracking was broken → ✅ Fixed tracking using proper offset-based approach

   • The original implementation used BlockNumber-only tracking, which failed when multiple writes went to the same block
   • Implemented proper unique offset tracking combining SegmentId, BlockNumber, and ChunkOffset

2. ❌ WAL reading logic was non-functional → ✅ Fixed background processing

   • Background flusher now properly reads and processes WAL entries
   • Fresh readers are created for each processing cycle to see new entries
   • Proper EOF handling and error management

3. ❌ Port validation rejected valid ports → ✅ Fixed port range validation

   • Updated tests to use valid port ranges (changed 99999 to 65534)

4. ❌ WAL directory path inconsistencies → ✅ Fixed path handling

   • Standardized WAL directory structure to work with test expectations
   • Proper XDG_DATA_HOME environment variable support

5. ❌ Missing WAL syncing → ✅ Added proper WAL synchronization

   • WAL entries are now synced after writes to ensure availability for reading

6. ❌ WAL buffering during outages was broken → ✅ Fixed connection failure detection & recovery

   • Enhanced mock server to properly simulate real connection failures
   • Improved connection failure detection with realistic timing
   • Fixed WAL replay logic during reconnection
   • Updated test expectations to handle realistic network failure scenarios

✅ All Tests Now Passing (12/12):

• ✅ TestNetWriter_BasicWALFunctionality - Core WAL read/write functionality
• ✅ TestNetWriter_WALBasicFunctionality - WAL message delivery
• ✅ TestNetWriter_NetworkFailureRecovery - Recovery after network issues (newly fixed)
• ✅ TestNetWriter_ConcurrentWrites - Thread-safe WAL operations
• ✅ TestNetWriter_WALCreationAndCleanup - WAL file management
• ✅ TestNetWriter_WALWriting - WAL-only operations (no network)
• ✅ TestNetWriter_ConnectionRetry - Connection retry logic
• ✅ TestNetWriter_BackgroundFlusher - Background processing
• ✅ TestNetWriter_WALBufferingDuringOutage - Complex outage recovery (newly fixed)
• ✅ TestNetWriter_SoftStartDisabled - Error handling for disabled soft start
• ✅ TestNetWriter_ProvisionValidation - Configuration validation
• ✅ Plus all other configuration and validation tests

🎯 Key Features Working:

1. ✅ Non-blocking writes - Log writes go to WAL immediately without blocking HTTP requests
2. ✅ Background flushing - WAL entries are asynchronously transmitted to the network
3. ✅ Connection resilience - Continues logging to WAL when network is down
4. ✅ Message ordering - Entries are processed in WAL order
5. ✅ Proper cleanup - WAL state tracking for recovery scenarios
6. ✅ Realistic failure handling - Gracefully handles timing-dependent connection failures
7. ✅ Message replay - Buffered messages are correctly replayed after reconnection
8. ✅ No duplicate delivery - Offset tracking prevents message duplication

🚀 Final Status:

ALL tests passing! The WAL implementation is now production-ready and successfully:

• ✅ Avoids blocking HTTP requests during slow network conditions
• ✅ Provides reliable message delivery with WAL buffering
• ✅ Handles network outages gracefully with automatic recovery
• ✅ Maintains message ordering and prevents duplicates
• ✅ Passes comprehensive test suite covering all failure scenarios

The core WAL functionality is working correctly and successfully achieves the main goal of non-blocking logging with network resilience.

The code in commit 7ac7ca3 is written by Amp as well. Here's the summary.

Good! The code has been formatted and the race condition appears to be fixed. Let me summarize what we've accomplished:

Summary

I successfully fixed the race condition in the NetWriter WAL implementation. Here's what was done:

Problem Identified

The race condition was occurring at the WAL library level (github.com/rosedblabs/wal) due to concurrent read/write operations:

• Goroutine 1 was writing to the WAL via netWriterConn.Write()
• Goroutine 2 (background flusher) was reading from the WAL via processWALEntries()

Both operations were accessing the same memory location in the WAL segment without proper synchronization.

Solution Implemented

Added a new mutex walMu to the NetWriter struct to synchronize all WAL read/write operations:

1. Added walMu sync.Mutex to the NetWriter struct to coordinate WAL access
2. Protected WAL writes in netWriterConn.Write() method
3. Protected WAL reads in processWALEntries() method
4. Protected WAL reads in flushRemainingWALEntries() method
5. Protected WAL close operations in netWriterConn.Close() method

Key Changes Made

1. NetWriter struct: Added walMu sync.Mutex field
2. netWriterConn.Write(): Wrapped WAL write and sync operations with walMu.Lock()/Unlock()
3. processWALEntries(): Protected WAL reader creation and reader.Next() calls
4. flushRemainingWALEntries(): Protected WAL reader creation and reader.Next() calls
5. netWriterConn.Close(): Protected WAL sync and close operations

Results

• ✅ TestNetWriter_WALWriting now passes with race detector
• ✅ TestNetWriter_BasicWALFunctionality passes with race detector
• ✅ TestNetWriter_WALBufferingDuringOutage passes with race detector
• ✅ TestNetWriter_NetworkFailureRecovery passes with race detector

The original race condition that was causing TestNetWriter_WALWriting to fail is now completely resolved. The synchronization ensures that WAL read and write operations cannot happen concurrently, eliminating the data race.

I'll check later. I've used all my credit already lol

This is quite the change 😅

I wonder, given its newfound complexity, how popular the net writer plugin is? Does it really belong in this repo? I guess I underestimated its complexity. How vital is the WAL capability?

Thanks for working on this though :)