RFC 4589 - Location Types Registry

[フレーム]

Network Working Group H. Schulzrinne
Request for Comments: 4589 Columbia U.
Category: Standards Track H. Tschofenig
 Siemens
 July 2006
 Location Types Registry
Status of This Memo
 This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
 Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
 improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
 Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
 and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
Abstract
 This document creates a registry for describing the types of places a
 human or end system might be found. The registry is then referenced
 by other protocols that need a common set of location terms as
 protocol constants. Examples of location terms defined in this
 document include aircraft, office, and train station.
Table of Contents
 1. Introduction ....................................................2
 2. Terminology .....................................................3
 3. Location Types ..................................................3
 4. Schema ..........................................................6
 5. IANA Considerations .............................................7
 5.1. Registering Tokens .........................................7
 5.2. URN Sub-Namespace Registration for
 urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type .......................8
 5.3. Schema Registration for Schema
 urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type .......................9
 6. Internationalization Considerations .............................9
 7. Security Considerations .........................................9
 8. Acknowledgements ................................................9
 9. References .....................................................10
 9.1. Normative References ......................................10
 9.2. Informative References ....................................10
Schulzrinne & Tschofenig Standards Track [Page 1]

RFC 4589 Location Types Registry July 2006
1. Introduction
 This document creates a registry for location type tokens. We
 anticipate that the network, through configuration or management
 protocols, tells a mobile device what kind of location it finds
 itself in. The device and associated software can then tailor its
 behavior to the environment. For example, this document defines the
 terms "classroom", "place-of-worship", and "theater". A considerate
 owner of a cell phone might program the device to switch from ringer
 to vibrate mode in such environments. Just knowing the geographic
 location, be it as civic (street address) or geospatial coordinates,
 would generally not allow the device to make a similar decision.
 Naturally, the number of descriptive terms for physical environments
 is almost unbounded. This registry tries to identify common terms
 that are likely to be useful for communications devices and for
 controlling and guiding communications behavior. The terms roughly
 correspond to the level of details of location descriptions and icons
 found on geographic maps, for example, and are meant to be in common
 use across a variety of cultures and countries. The registration
 process described in the IANA Considerations section allows this list
 to be extended as needed, while aiming to prevent an unnecessary
 explosion in the registry.
 The use of tokens (i.e., protocol constants) makes it easier to build
 systems across multiple languages. A user interface can readily
 translate a finite set of tokens to user-appropriate textual or
 iconic representations. Protocols using this registry are encouraged
 to provide additional mechanisms to accommodate location types not
 currently registered via free-text fields with appropriate language
 and character set labeling.
 The terms defined in this registry do not attempt to provide a
 hierarchy of location descriptions, except in certain special cases.
 For example, the term "restaurant" is defined to include the term
 "cafe", and the term "public" encompasses a range of descriptors, as
 noted below. The registry makes these more generic terms available
 as often the more detailed distinctions may not be available, or
 privacy concerns suggest the use of less precise terms that are still
 sufficient to guide communications behavior or evaluate the source of
 a phone call or message, say.
 In many cases, a location might be described by multiple terms that
 apply at the same time. For example, the combination of "restaurant"
 and "airport" is immediately recognizable. This registry makes no
 attempt to limit the number of terms that can be used to describe a
 single place or to restrict what combinations are allowed, given that
 there are few combinations that are physically impossible. Common
Schulzrinne & Tschofenig Standards Track [Page 2]

RFC 4589 Location Types Registry July 2006
 sense is probably a better guide here; the authors would not want to
 rule out creative business models such as combinations of "parking"
 and "restaurant" or "bar" and "hospital". The number of terms that
 can be used within the same protocol element is left to the protocol
 description.
 This document does not describe how the values of the registry are to
 be used, as this description is provided by other documents. For
 example, [5] describes options for carrying civic address
 information, including the place type attributes listed in this
 document, using the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and
 DHCPv6). A usage for Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service
 (RADIUS) is described in [6], where this information is conveyed from
 the RADIUS client to the RADIUS server. Rich presence (RPID [4])
 also utilizes the values of the location types registry.
2. Terminology
 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
 document are to be interpreted as described in [1].
3. Location Types
 This section describes types of locations where an entity is located.
 The entity is not further specified and can be a person or an object
 such as a network access point or end system.
 aircraft: A device that is used or intended to be used for flight in
 the air, such as an airplane, helicopter, gyroplane, glider, or
 lighter-than-air devices like a balloon.
 airport: A place from which aircrafts operate, such as an airport or
 heliport.
 arena: Enclosed area used for sports events.
 automobile: An automotive vehicle, usually four-wheeled, designed
 for passenger transportation, such as a car.
 bank: Business establishment in which money is kept for saving,
 commercial purposes, is invested, supplied for loans, or
 exchanged.
 bar: A bar or saloon.
 bicycle: A vehicle with two wheels tandem, a steering handle, a
 saddle seat, and pedals by which it is propelled.
Schulzrinne & Tschofenig Standards Track [Page 3]

RFC 4589 Location Types Registry July 2006
 bus: A large motor vehicle designed to carry passengers.
 bus-station: Terminal that serves bus passengers, such as a bus
 depot or bus terminal.
 cafe: Usually a small and informal establishment that serves various
 refreshments (such as coffee); coffee shop.
 classroom: Academic classroom or lecture hall.
 club: Dance club, nightclub, or discotheque.
 construction: Construction site.
 convention-center: Convention center or exhibition hall.
 government: Government building, such as those used by the
 legislative, executive, or judicial branches of governments,
 including court houses, police stations, and military
 installations.
 hospital: Hospital, hospice, medical clinic, mental institution, or
 doctor's office.
 hotel: Hotel, motel, inn, or other lodging establishment.
 industrial: Industrial setting, such as a manufacturing floor or
 power plant.
 library: Library or other public place in which literary and
 artistic materials, such as books, music, periodicals, newspapers,
 pamphlets, prints, records, and tapes, are kept for reading,
 reference, or lending.
 motorcycle: A two-wheeled automotive vehicle, including a scooter.
 office: Business setting, such as an office.
 other: A place without a registered place type representation.
 outdoors: Outside a building, in or into the open air, such as a
 park or city streets.
 parking: A parking lot or parking garage.
 place-of-worship: A religious site where congregations gather for
 religious observances, such as a church, chapel, meetinghouse,
 mosque, shrine, synagogue, or temple.
Schulzrinne & Tschofenig Standards Track [Page 4]

RFC 4589 Location Types Registry July 2006
 prison: Correctional institution where persons are confined while on
 trial or for punishment, such as a prison, penitentiary, jail,
 brig.
 public: Public area such as a shopping mall, street, park, public
 building, train station, or airport or in public conveyance such
 as a bus, train, plane, or ship. This general description
 encompasses the more precise descriptors 'street', 'public-
 transport', 'aircraft', 'bus', 'bus-station', 'train', 'train-
 station', 'airport', 'shopping-area', 'outdoors', and
 'watercraft'.
 public-transport: Any form of public transport, including aircraft,
 bus, train, or ship.
 residence: A private or residential setting, not necessarily the
 personal residence of the entity, e.g., including a friend's home.
 restaurant: Restaurant, coffee shop, or other public dining
 establishment.
 school: School or university property, but not necessarily a
 classroom or library.
 shopping-area: Shopping mall or shopping area. This area is a
 large, often enclosed, shopping complex containing various stores,
 businesses, and restaurants usually accessible by common
 passageways.
 stadium: Large, usually open structure for sports events, including
 a racetrack.
 store: Place where merchandise is offered for sale, such as a shop.
 street: A public thoroughfare, such as an avenue, street, alley,
 lane, or road, including any sidewalks.
 theater: Theater, lecture hall, auditorium, classroom, movie
 theater, or similar facility designed for presentations, talks,
 plays, music performances, and other events involving an audience.
 train: Train, monorail, maglev, cable car, or similar conveyance.
 train-station: Terminal where trains load or unload passengers or
 goods; railway station, railroad station, railroad terminal, train
 depot.
Schulzrinne & Tschofenig Standards Track [Page 5]

RFC 4589 Location Types Registry July 2006
 truck: An automotive vehicle suitable for hauling, used primarily to
 carry goods rather than people.
 underway: In a land-, water-, or aircraft that is underway (in
 motion).
 unknown: The type of place is unknown.
 warehouse: Place in which goods or merchandise are stored, such as a
 storehouse or self-storage facility.
 water: In, on, or above bodies of water, such as an ocean, lake,
 river, canal, or other waterway.
 watercraft: On a vessel for travel on water such as a boat or ship.
4. Schema
 This registry can be used in two ways, first, as a list of tokens, to
 be referenced by appropriate protocols that accept textual tokens,
 and second, as a schema, with its own namespace, referenced by other
 schema, either explicitly or via namespace="##other".
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <xs:schema targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type"
 xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type"
 xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
 elementFormDefault="qualified"
 attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
 <xs:complexType name="empty"/>
 <xs:complexType name="Note_t">
 <xs:simpleContent>
 <xs:extension base="xs:string">
 <xs:attribute ref="xml:lang"/>
 </xs:extension>
 </xs:simpleContent>
 </xs:complexType>
 <xs:element name="aircraft" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="airport" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="arena" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="automobile" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="bank" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="bar" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="bicyle" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="bus" type="empty" />
Schulzrinne & Tschofenig Standards Track [Page 6]

RFC 4589 Location Types Registry July 2006
 <xs:element name="bus-station" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="cafe" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="classroom" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="club" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="construction" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="convention-center" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="government" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="hospital" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="hotel" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="industrial" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="library" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="motorcycle" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="office" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="other" type="Note_t"/>
 <xs:element name="outdoors" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="parking" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="place-of-worship" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="prison" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="public" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="public-transport" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="residence" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="restaurant" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="school" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="shopping-area" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="stadium" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="store" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="street" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="theater" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="train" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="train-station" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="truck" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="underway" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="unknown" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="warehouse" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="water" type="empty" />
 <xs:element name="watercraft" type="empty" />
 </xs:schema>
5. IANA Considerations
5.1. Registering Tokens
 This document creates new IANA registries for location types as
 listed in Section 3, starting with 'aircraft' and finishing with
 'watercraft'.
 IANA will maintain this registry both in the form of an XML schema
 and a list of tokens, with the same content.
Schulzrinne & Tschofenig Standards Track [Page 7]

RFC 4589 Location Types Registry July 2006
 Following the policies outline in RFC 2434 [2], new tokens are
 assigned after Expert Review. The Expert Reviewer will generally
 consult the IETF GeoPRIV working group mailing list or its designated
 successor. Updates or deletions of tokens from the registration
 follow the same procedures.
 The expert review should be guided by a few common sense
 considerations. For example, tokens should not be specific to a
 country, region, organization, or company; they should be well-
 defined and widely recognized. The expert's support of IANA will
 include providing IANA with the new token(s) when the update is
 provided only in the form of a schema, and providing IANA with the
 new schema element(s) when the update is provided only in the form of
 a token.
 To ensure widespread usability across protocols, tokens MUST follow
 the character set restrictions for XML Names [3].
 Each registration must include the name of the token and a brief
 description similar to the ones offered herein for the initial
 registrations contained this document:
 Token Identifier: Identifier of the token.
 Description: Brief description indicating the meaning of the token,
 including one or more examples where the term encompasses several
 more precise terms.
 XML namespace: Tokens MAY be used as elements within other
 appropriate XML documents. Each token lists the namespace it is
 part of, typically urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type:ext, where
 'ext' is the name of the extension.
 Note that the usage of these tokens is not limited to XML and the
 'Token Identifier' is the XML element content and not the XML element
 name.
5.2. URN Sub-Namespace Registration for
 urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type
 URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type
 Description: This is the XML namespace for XML elements defined by
 RFC4589 to describe location types within XML documents.
 Registrant Contact: IETF, GEOPRIV working group, geopriv@ietf.org,
 Henning Schulzrinne, hgs@cs.columbia.edu
Schulzrinne & Tschofenig Standards Track [Page 8]

RFC 4589 Location Types Registry July 2006
 XML:
 BEGIN
 <?xml version="1.0"?>
 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.0//EN"
 "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic10.dtd">
 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
 <head>
 <meta http-equiv="content-type"
 content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1"/>
 <title>Location Types Registry</title>
 </head>
 <body>
 <h1>Namespace for Location Types</h1>
 <h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type</h2>
 <p>See <a href="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4589.txt">
 RFC4589</a>.</p>
 </body>
 </html>
 END
5.3. Schema Registration for Schema
 urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type
 URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:location-type
 Registrant Contact: IESG
 XML: See Section 4
6. Internationalization Considerations
 The location type values listed in this document MUST NOT be
 presented to the user. The values therefore have the characteristic
 of tokens or tags and no internationalization support is required.
7. Security Considerations
 This document defines a registry for location types and as such does
 not raise security issues.
8. Acknowledgements
 Vijay Gurbani, Paul Kyzivat, and Jonathan Rosenberg contributed to
 RPID [4], which led to the location types listed in this document.
 Many thanks to Harald Alvestrand, Frank Ellermann, Bill Fenner, Ted
 Hardie, David Kessens, Allison Mankin, Jon Peterson, and Sam Hartman
 for their suggestions. Rick Jones pointed us to the Global Justice
Schulzrinne & Tschofenig Standards Track [Page 9]

RFC 4589 Location Types Registry July 2006
 XML work (see http://it.ojp.gov/jxdm/) that helped us to add more
 values to the location registry.
 Some of the definitions are derived from the Merriam-Webster Online
 Dictionary.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
 [1] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
 Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
 [2] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA
 Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434, October 1998.
 [3] Sperberg-McQueen, C., Maler, E., Bray, T., Paoli, J., and F.
 Yergeau, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third Edition)",
 World Wide Web Consortium
 Recommendation http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204,
 February 2004.
9.2. Informative References
 [4] Schulzrinne, H., "RPID: Rich Presence Extensions to the Presence
 Information Data Format (PIDF)", Work in Progress,
 December 2005.
 [5] Schulzrinne, H., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4
 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration
 Information", Work in Progress, January 2006.
 [6] Tschofenig, H., "Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS", Work in
 Progress, March 2006.
Schulzrinne & Tschofenig Standards Track [Page 10]

RFC 4589 Location Types Registry July 2006
Authors' Addresses
 Henning Schulzrinne
 Columbia University
 Department of Computer Science
 450 Computer Science Building
 New York, NY 10027
 USA
 Phone: +1 212 939 7042
 EMail: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
 URI: http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs
 Hannes Tschofenig
 Siemens
 Otto-Hahn-Ring 6
 Munich, Bavaria 81739
 Germany
 EMail: Hannes.Tschofenig@siemens.com
 URI: http://www.tschofenig.com
Schulzrinne & Tschofenig Standards Track [Page 11]

RFC 4589 Location Types Registry July 2006
Full Copyright Statement
 Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
 This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
 contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
 retain all their rights.
 This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
 "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
 OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
 ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
 INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
 INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
 WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
 The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
 Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
 pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
 this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
 might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
 made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
 on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
 found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
 Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
 assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
 attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
 such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
 specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
 http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
 The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
 copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
 rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
 this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
 ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
 Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
 Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
Schulzrinne & Tschofenig Standards Track [Page 12]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /