draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-07

[フレーム]

XMPP Working Group L. Stout, Ed.
Internet-Draft &yet
Intended status: Standards Track J. Moffitt
Expires: December 8, 2014 Mozilla
 E. Cestari
 cstar industries
 June 6, 2014
 An XMPP Sub-protocol for WebSocket
 draft-ietf-xmpp-websocket-07
Abstract
 This document defines a binding for the XMPP protocol over a
 WebSocket transport layer. A WebSocket binding for XMPP provides
 higher performance than the current HTTP binding for XMPP.
Status of This Memo
 This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
 provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
 Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
 working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
 Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
 and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
 time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
 material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
 This Internet-Draft will expire on December 8, 2014.
Copyright Notice
 Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
 document authors. All rights reserved.
 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
 Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
 (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
 publication of this document. Please review these documents
 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
 to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
 include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 1]

Internet-Draft XMPP over WebSocket June 2014
 the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
 described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 3. XMPP Sub-Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 3.1. Handshake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
 3.2. WebSocket Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
 3.3. XMPP Framing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
 3.3.1. Framed XML Stream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
 3.3.2. Framed Stream Namespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
 3.3.3. Stream Frames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
 3.4. Stream Initiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
 3.5. Stream Errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
 3.6. Closing the Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
 3.6.1. see-other-uri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
 3.7. Stream Restarts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
 3.8. Pings and Keepalives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
 3.9. Use of TLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
 3.10. Stream Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
 4. Discovering the WebSocket Connection Method . . . . . . . . . 9
 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
 5.1. WebSocket Subprotocol Name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
 5.2. URN Sub-Namespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
 6.1. Intermediary Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
 7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
 7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
 7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
 Appendix A. XML Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1. Introduction
 Applications using the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol
 (XMPP) (see [RFC6120] and [RFC6121]) on the Web currently make use of
 BOSH (see [XEP-0124] and [XEP-0206]), an XMPP binding to HTTP. BOSH
 is based on the HTTP long polling technique, and it suffers from high
 transport overhead compared to XMPP's native binding to TCP. In
 addition, there are a number of other known issues with long polling
 [RFC6202], which have an impact on BOSH-based systems.
 It would be much better in most circumstances to avoid tunneling XMPP
 over HTTP long polled connections and instead use the XMPP protocol
 directly. However, the APIs and sandbox that browsers have provided
 do not allow this. The WebSocket protocol [RFC6455] exists to solve
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 2]

Internet-Draft XMPP over WebSocket June 2014
 these kinds of problems and is a bidirectional protocol that provides
 a simple message-based framing layer over raw sockets, allowing for
 more robust and efficient communication in web applications.
 The WebSocket protocol enables two-way communication between a client
 and a server, effectively emulating TCP at the application layer and
 therefore overcoming many of the problems with existing long-polling
 techniques for bidirectional HTTP. This document defines a WebSocket
 sub-protocol for XMPP.
2. Terminology
 The basic unit of framing in the WebSocket protocol is called a
 message. In XMPP, the basic unit is the stanza, which is a subset of
 the first-level children of each document in an XMPP stream (see
 Section 9 of [RFC6120]). XMPP also has a concept of messages, which
 are stanzas with a top-level element of <message/>. In this
 document, the word "message" will mean a WebSocket message, not an
 XMPP message stanza, unless otherwise noted.
 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
 "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
 "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
 [RFC2119].
3. XMPP Sub-Protocol
3.1. Handshake
 The XMPP sub-protocol is used to transport XMPP over a WebSocket
 connection. The client and server agree to this protocol during the
 WebSocket handshake (see Section 1.3 of [RFC6455]).
 During the WebSocket handshake, the client MUST include the
 value |xmpp| in the list of protocols for the |Sec-WebSocket-
 Protocol| header. The reply from the server MUST also contain |xmpp|
 in its own |Sec-WebSocket-Protocol| header in order for an XMPP sub-
 protocol connection to be established.
 Once the handshake is complete, WebSocket messages sent or received
 will conform to the protocol defined in the rest of this document.
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 3]

Internet-Draft XMPP over WebSocket June 2014
 C: GET /xmpp-websocket HTTP/1.1
 Host: example.com
 Upgrade: websocket
 Connection: Upgrade
 Sec-WebSocket-Key: dGhlIHNhbXBsZSBub25jZQ==
 Origin: http://example.com
 ...
 Sec-WebSocket-Protocol: xmpp
 Sec-WebSocket-Version: 13
 S: HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols
 Upgrade: websocket
 Connection: Upgrade
 ...
 Sec-WebSocket-Accept: s3pPLMBiTxaQ9kYGzzhZRbK+xOo=
 Sec-WebSocket-Protocol: xmpp
 [WebSocket connection established]
 C: <open xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-framing"
 to="example.com"
 version="1.0" />
 S: <open xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-framing"
 from="example.com"
 id="++TR84Sm6A3hnt3Q065SnAbbk3Y="
 xml:lang="en"
 version="1.0" />
3.2. WebSocket Messages
 Data frame messages in the XMPP sub-protocol MUST be of the text type
 and contain UTF-8 encoded data.
3.3. XMPP Framing
 The WebSocket XMPP sub-protocol deviates from the standard method of
 constructing and using XML streams as defined in [RFC6120] by
 adopting the message framing provided by WebSocket to delineate the
 stream open and close headers, stanzas, and other top-level stream
 elements.
3.3.1. Framed XML Stream
 The start of a framed XML stream is marked by the use of an opening
 "stream header" which is an <open/> element with the appropriate
 attributes and namespace declarations (see Section 3.3.2). The
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 4]

Internet-Draft XMPP over WebSocket June 2014
 attributes of the <open/> element are the same as those of the
 <stream/> element defined defined for the 'http://etherx.jabber.org/
 streams' namespace in [RFC6120] and with the same semantics and
 restrictions.
 The end of a framed XML stream is denoted by the closing "stream
 header" which is a <close/> element with its associated attributes
 and namespace declarations (see Section 3.3.2).
 The introduction of the <open/> and <close/> elements is motivated by
 the parsable XML document framing restriction in Section 3.3.3. As a
 consequence, note that a framed XML stream does not provided a
 wrapping <stream:stream/> element encompassing the entirety of the
 XML stream, as in [RFC6120].
3.3.2. Framed Stream Namespace
 The XML stream "headers" (the <open/> and <close/> elements) MUST be
 qualified by the namespace 'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-framing' (the
 "framed stream namespace"). If this rule is violated, the entity
 that receives the offending stream header MUST close the stream with
 an error, which MUST be <invalid-namespace> (see Section 4.9.3.10 of
 [RFC6120]).
3.3.3. Stream Frames
 The individual frames of a framed XML stream have a one-to-one
 correspondence with WebSocket messages, and MUST be parsable as
 standalone XML documents, complete with all relevant namespace and
 language declarations. The inclusion of XML declarations, however,
 is NOT RECOMMENDED as WebSocket messages are already mandated to be
 UTF-8 encoded and therefore would only add a constant size overhead
 to each message.
 The first character of each frame MUST be a '<' character.
 Every XMPP stanza or other XML element (including the stream open and
 close headers) sent directly over the XML stream MUST be sent in its
 own frame.
 Example of a WebSocket message that contains an independently
 parsable XML document:
 <message xmlns="jabber:client" xml:lang="en">
 <body>Every WebSocket message is parsable by itself.</body>
 </message>
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 5]

Internet-Draft XMPP over WebSocket June 2014
 Note that for stream features and errors, there is no parent context
 element providing the "stream" namespace prefix as in [RFC6120], and
 thus the stream prefix MUST be declared or use an unprefixed form:
 <stream:features xmlns:stream="http://etherx.jabber.org/streams">
 <bind xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-bind"/>
 </stream:features>
 -- OR --
 <error xmlns="http://etherx.jabber.org/streams">
 <host-unknown xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'/>
 </error>
3.4. Stream Initiation
 The first message sent after the WebSocket opening handshake MUST be
 from the initiating entity, and MUST be an <open/> element qualified
 by the "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-framing" namespace and with the
 same attributes mandated for the <stream> opening tag as described in
 Section 4.7 of [RFC6120].
 The receiving entity MUST respond with either an <open /> element
 (whose attributes match those described in Section 4.7 of [RFC6120])
 or a <close /> element (see Section 3.6.1).
 An example of a successful stream initiation exchange:
 C: <open xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-framing"
 to="example.com"
 version="1.0" />
 S: <open xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-framing"
 from="example.com"
 id="++TR84Sm6A3hnt3Q065SnAbbk3Y="
 xml:lang="en"
 version="1.0" />
 Clients MUST NOT multiplex XMPP streams over the same WebSocket.
3.5. Stream Errors
 Stream level errors in XMPP are terminal. Should such an error
 occur, the server MUST send the stream error as a complete element in
 a message to the client.
 If the error occurs during the opening of a stream, the server MUST
 send the initial open element response, followed by the stream level
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 6]

Internet-Draft XMPP over WebSocket June 2014
 error in a second WebSocket message frame. The server MUST then
 close the connection as specified in Section 3.6.
3.6. Closing the Connection
 The closing process for the XMPP sub-protocol mirrors that of the
 XMPP TCP binding as defined in Section 4.4 of [RFC6120], except that
 a <close/> element is used instead of the ending </stream:stream>
 tag.
 Either the server or the client may close the connection at any time.
 Before closing the connection, the closing party is expected to first
 close the XMPP stream (if one has been opened) by sending a message
 with the <close/> element, qualified by the "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns
 :xmpp-framing" namespace. The stream is considered closed when a
 corresponding <close/> element is received from the other party, and
 the XMPP session is ended.
 To then close the WebSocket connection, the closing party MUST
 initiate the WebSocket closing handshake (see Section 7.1.2 of
 [RFC6455]).
 An example of ending an XMPP over WebSocket session by first closing
 the XMPP stream layer and then the WebSocket connection layer:
 Client (XMPP WSS) Server
 | | | |
 | | <close xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-framing /> | |
 | |------------------------------------------------------------>| |
 | | <close xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-framing" /> | |
 | |<------------------------------------------------------------| |
 | | | |
 | | (XMPP Stream Closed) | |
 | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ |
 | |
 | WS CLOSE FRAME |
 |------------------------------------------------------------------>|
 | WS CLOSE FRAME |
 |<------------------------------------------------------------------|
 | |
 | (Connection Closed) |
 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
 If the WebSocket connection is closed or broken without the XMPP
 stream having been closed first, then the XMPP stream is considered
 implicitly closed and the XMPP session ended; however, if the use of
 stream management resumption was negotiated (see [XEP-0198]), the
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 7]

Internet-Draft XMPP over WebSocket June 2014
 server SHOULD consider the XMPP session still alive for a period of
 time based on server policy as specified in [XEP-0198].
3.6.1. see-other-uri
 If the server wishes at any point to instruct the client to move to a
 different WebSocket endpoint (e.g. for load balancing purposes), the
 server MAY send a <close/> element and set the "see-other-uri"
 attribute to the URI of the new connection endpoint (which MAY be for
 a different transport method, such as BOSH (see [XEP-0124] and
 [XEP-0206]).
 Clients MUST NOT accept suggested endpoints with a lower security
 context (e.g. moving from a "wss://" endpoint to a "ws://" or "http:/
 /" endpoint).
 An example of the server closing a stream and instructing the client
 to connect at a different WebSocket endpoint:
 S: <close xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-framing"
 see-other-uri="wss://otherendpoint.example/xmpp-bind" />
3.7. Stream Restarts
 Whenever a stream restart is mandated, both the server and client
 streams are implicitly closed and new streams MUST be opened, using
 the same process as in Section 3.4. The client MUST send a new
 stream <open/> element and MUST NOT send a closing <close/> element.
 An example of restarting the stream after successful SASL
 negotiation:
 S: <success xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-sasl" />
 [Streams implicitly closed]
 C: <open xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-framing"
 to="example.com"
 version="1.0" />
3.8. Pings and Keepalives
 Traditionally, XMPP servers and clients often send "whitespace
 keepalives" (see Section 4.6.1 of [RFC6120]) between stanzas to
 maintain an XML stream. However, for the XMPP sub-protocol, each
 message is required to start with a '<' character, and as such
 whitespace keepalives MUST NOT be used.
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 8]

Internet-Draft XMPP over WebSocket June 2014
 As alternatives, the XMPP Ping extension [XEP-0199] and the XMPP
 Stream Management extension [XEP-0198] provide pinging mechanisms.
 The use of either of these extensions (or both) MAY be used to
 determine the state of the connection.
 Clients and servers MAY also use WebSocket ping control frames for
 this purpose, but note that some environments, such as browsers, do
 not provide access for generating or monitoring ping control frames.
3.9. Use of TLS
 TLS cannot be used at the XMPP sub-protocol layer because the sub-
 protocol does not allow for raw binary data to be sent. Instead,
 when TLS is used, it MUST be enabled the WebSocket layer using secure
 WebSocket connections via the |wss| URI scheme. (See Section 10.6 of
 [RFC6455].)
 Because TLS is to be provided outside of the XMPP sub-protocol layer,
 a server MUST NOT advertise TLS as a stream feature (see Section 4.6
 of [RFC6120]), and a client MUST ignore any advertised TLS stream
 feature, when using the XMPP sub-protocol.
3.10. Stream Management
 In order to alleviate the problems of temporary disconnections, the
 XMPP Stream Management extension [XEP-0198] MAY be used to confirm
 when stanzas have been received by the server.
 In particular, the use of session resumption in [XEP-0198] MAY be
 used to allow for recreating the same stream session state after a
 temporary network unavailability or after navigating to a new URL in
 a browser.
4. Discovering the WebSocket Connection Method
 Section 3 of [RFC6120] defines a procedure for connecting to an XMPP
 server, including ways to discover the TCP/IP address and port of the
 server. When using the WebSocket binding as specified in this
 document (instead of the TCP binding as specified in [RFC6120]), a
 client needs an alternative way to discover information about the
 server's connection methods, since web browsers and other WebSocket-
 capable software applications typically cannot obtain such
 information from the Domain Name System.
 The alternative lookup process uses Web Host Metadata [RFC6415] and
 Web Linking [RFC5988], where the link relation type is "urn:xmpp:alt-
 connections:websocket" as described in Discovering Alternate XMPP
 Connection Methods [XEP-0156]. An example follows.
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 9]

Internet-Draft XMPP over WebSocket June 2014
 <XRD xmlns='http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/xri/xrd-1.0'>
 <Link rel="urn:xmpp:alt-connections:websocket"
 href="wss://webcm.example.net:443/ws" />
 </XRD>
 Servers MAY expose discovery information using host-meta documents,
 and clients MAY use such information to determine the WebSocket
 endpoint for a server.
 Use of web-host metadata MAY be used to establish trust between the
 XMPP server domain and the WebSocket endpoint, particularly in multi-
 tenant situations where the same WebSocket endpoint is serving
 multiple XMPP domains.
5. IANA Considerations
5.1. WebSocket Subprotocol Name
 This specification requests IANA to register the WebSocket XMPP sub-
 protocol under the "WebSocket Subprotocol Name" Registry with the
 following data:
 Subprotocol Identifier: xmpp
 Subprotocol Common Name: WebSocket Transport for the Extensible
 Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)
 Subprotocol Definition: this document
5.2. URN Sub-Namespace
 A URN sub-namespace for framing of Extensible Messaging and Presence
 Protocol (XMPP) streams is defined as follows.
 URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-framing
 Specification: this document
 Description: This is the XML namespace name for framing of
 Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) streams as
 defined by RFC XXXX.
 Registrant Contact: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 10]

Internet-Draft XMPP over WebSocket June 2014
6. Security Considerations
 Since application level TLS cannot be used (see Section 3.9),
 applications need to protect the privacy of XMPP traffic at the
 WebSocket or other appropriate layer.
 Browser based applications are not able to inspect and verify at the
 application layer the certificate used for the WebSocket connection
 to ensure that it corresponds to the domain specified as the "to"
 address of the XMPP stream. For hosts whose domain matches the
 origin for the WebSocket connection, that check is already performed
 by the browser. However, in situations where the domain of the XMPP
 server might not match the origin for the WebSocket endpoint
 (especially multi-tenant hosting situations), the web host metadata
 method (see [RFC6415] and [XEP-0156]) MAY be used to delegate trust
 from the XMPP server domain to the WebSocket origin.
 When presented with a new WebSocket endpoint via the "see-other-uri"
 attribute of a <close/> element, clients MUST NOT accept the
 suggestion if the security context of the new endpoint is lower than
 the current one in order to prevent downgrade attacks from a "wss://"
 endpoint to "ws://".
 The Security Considerations for both WebSocket (see Section 10 of
 [RFC6455] and XMPP (see Section 13 of [RFC6120]) apply to the
 WebSocket XMPP sub-protocol.
6.1. Intermediary Services
 If the XMPP over WebSocket endpoint is provided as an intermediary
 service between a backend XMPP service and the client, then it SHOULD
 encrypt its connection to the backend XMPP service using any
 available and appropriate technologies, such as TLS and StartTLS.
 If data privacy is desired, a client SHOULD encrypt its messages
 using an application specific end-to-end encryption technology, as
 there is no way for the client to ensure that the XMPP over WebSocket
 service is using an encryped connection to the backend XMPP service.
 Methods for doing so are beyond the scope of this specification.
7. References
7.1. Normative References
 [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
 Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 11]

Internet-Draft XMPP over WebSocket June 2014
 [RFC6120] Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
 Protocol (XMPP): Core", RFC 6120, March 2011.
 [RFC6455] Fette, I. and A. Melnikov, "The WebSocket Protocol", RFC
 6455, December 2011.
7.2. Informative References
 [RFC5988] Nottingham, M., "Web Linking", RFC 5988, October 2010.
 [RFC6121] Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence
 Protocol (XMPP): Instant Messaging and Presence", RFC
 6121, March 2011.
 [RFC6202] Loreto, S., Saint-Andre, P., Salsano, S., and G. Wilkins,
 "Known Issues and Best Practices for the Use of Long
 Polling and Streaming in Bidirectional HTTP", RFC 6202,
 April 2011.
 [RFC6415] Hammer-Lahav, E. and B. Cook, "Web Host Metadata", RFC
 6415, October 2011.
 [XEP-0124]
 Paterson, I., Smith, D., Saint-Andre, P., Moffitt, J., and
 L. Stout, "Bidirectional-streams Over Synchronous HTTP
 (BOSH)", XSF XEP 0124, November 2013.
 [XEP-0156]
 Hildebrand, J., Saint-Andre, P., and L. Stout,
 "Discovering Alternative XMPP Connection Methods", XSF XEP
 0156, January 2014.
 [XEP-0198]
 Karneges, J., Saint-Andre, P., Hildebrand, J., Forno, F.,
 Cridland, D., and M. Wild, "Stream Management", XSF XEP
 0198, June 2011.
 [XEP-0199]
 Saint-Andre, P., "XMPP Ping", XSF XEP 0199, June 2009.
 [XEP-0206]
 Paterson, I., Saint-Andre, P., and L. Stout, "XMPP Over
 BOSH", XSF XEP 0206, November 2013.
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 12]

Internet-Draft XMPP over WebSocket June 2014
 [XML-SCHEMA]
 Thompson, H., Maloney, M., Mendelsohn, N., and D. Beech,
 "XML Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition", World Wide
 Web Consortium Recommendation REC-xmlschema-1-20041028,
 October 2004,
 <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028>.
Appendix A. XML Schema
 The following schema formally defines the 'urn:ietf:params:xml:ns
 :xmpp-framing' namespace used in this document, in conformance with
 W3C XML Schema [XML-SCHEMA]. Because validation of XML streams and
 stanzas is optional, this schema is not normative and is provided for
 descriptive purposes only.
 <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
 <xs:schema
 xmlns:xs='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema'
 targetNamespace='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-framing'
 xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-framing'
 elementFormDefault='unqualified'>
 <xs:element name='open'>
 <xs:complexType>
 <xs:simpleContent>
 <xs:extension base='empty'>
 <xs:attribute name='from' type='xs:string'
 use='optional'/>
 <xs:attribute name='id' type='xs:string'
 use='optional'/>
 <xs:attribute name='to' type='xs:string'
 use='optional'/>
 <xs:attribute name='version' type='xs:decimal'
 use='optional'/>
 <xs:attribute ref='xml:lang'
 use='optional'/>
 </xs:extension>
 </xs:simpleContent>
 </xs:complexType>
 </xs:element>
 <xs:element name='close'>
 <xs:complexType>
 <xs:simpleContent>
 <xs:extension base='empty'>
 <xs:attribute name='from' type='xs:string'
 use='optional'/>
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 13]

Internet-Draft XMPP over WebSocket June 2014
 <xs:attribute name='id' type='xs:string'
 use='optional'/>
 <xs:attribute name='see-other-uri' type='xs:anyURI'
 use='optional'/>
 <xs:attribute name='to' type='xs:string'
 use='optional'/>
 <xs:attribute name='version' type='xs:decimal'
 use='optional'/>
 <xs:attribute ref='xml:lang'
 use='optional'/>
 </xs:extension>
 </xs:simpleContent>
 </xs:complexType>
 </xs:element>
 <xs:simpleType name='empty'>
 <xs:restriction base='xs:string'>
 <xs:enumeration value=''/>
 </xs:restriction>
 </xs:simpleType>
 </xs:schema>
Authors' Addresses
 Lance Stout (editor)
 &yet
 Email: lance@andyet.net
 Jack Moffitt
 Mozilla
 Email: jack@metajack.im
 Eric Cestari
 cstar industries
 Email: eric@cstar.io
Stout, et al. Expires December 8, 2014 [Page 14]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /