[uf-new] PROPOSAL: Replace hAudio FN with TITLE

Ryan King ryan at theryanking.com
Fri Feb 22 12:38:04 PST 2008


On Feb 15, 2008, at 9:42 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Ben Ward wrote:
>>> For my 2¢, I think the ‘audio-title’ route is OK
>> I agree. I was just looking back over how we got here on this 
> issue, and I'm afraid it may be largely my fault. When AUDIO-TITLE 
> was widely accepted, Brian said "what about FN?" and then Manu 
> raised an issue with FN and then I suggested a resolution for that 
> issue, and Manu agreed. So we moved forward with FN, but in 
> retrospect I think it was a mistake to treat the resolution of one 
> issue with FN as a reason to go with FN over AUDIO-TITLE without 
> ever really comparing the alternatives. I never saw a problem with 
> AUDIO-TITLE. I think I just got so into defending FN that I stopped 
> openly considering the alternatives. Now that I reconsider them, I 
> agree with Ben that AUDIO-TITLE looks OK.

This sounds like a good way forward to me. Any reason why audio-title 
shouldn't be reconsidered?
-ryan


More information about the microformats-new mailing list

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /