[uf-new] PROPOSAL: Replace hAudio FN with TITLE

Fri Feb 15 21:42:15 PST 2008

On Feb 15, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Ben Ward wrote:
> For my 2¢, I think the ‘audio-title’ route is OK

I agree. I was just looking back over how we got here on this issue, 
and I'm afraid it may be largely my fault. When AUDIO-TITLE was 
widely accepted, Brian said "what about FN?" and then Manu raised an 
issue with FN and then I suggested a resolution for that issue, and 
Manu agreed. So we moved forward with FN, but in retrospect I think 
it was a mistake to treat the resolution of one issue with FN as a 
reason to go with FN over AUDIO-TITLE without ever really comparing 
the alternatives. I never saw a problem with AUDIO-TITLE. I think I 
just got so into defending FN that I stopped openly considering the 
alternatives. Now that I reconsider them, I agree with Ben that AUDIO- 
TITLE looks OK.
--
Scott Reynen
MakeDataMakeSense.com