Re: Optimizing interpreters (was Re: LuaJIT with vectors)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Optimizing interpreters (was Re: LuaJIT with vectors)
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: 2010年11月19日 09:59:21 -0200
> I'm not sure you'd be able to see much of a difference, except for
> big arrays. The dispatch/decode overhead in the Lua interpreter
> might shadow the effects.
There is no much difference, indeed...
> But AFAIR it's not that much code that needs to be changed. Split
> the internal and external tag representation and adjust the macros
> that deal with tagged values. You'll need to add explicit tests
> for numbers in a couple places, instead of a switch () on the tag.
I wrote an lobject.h with these changes some time ago. I will update
it and post to the list.
> And, most importantly, canonicalize all NaNs at the ingress points
> to the VM! For Lua that's only lua_pushnumber, string-to-number
> conversions and maybe the bytecode loader.
I unserstand the problem with lua_pushnumber (which copies whatever
number you give to it), but why can string-to-number conversions
generate non canonical NaNs?
-- Roberto
- References:
- Re: LuaJIT with vectors, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT with vectors, Alex Queiroz
- Re: LuaJIT with vectors, David Kastrup
- Re: LuaJIT with vectors, Alex Queiroz
- Re: LuaJIT with vectors, David Kastrup
- Re: LuaJIT with vectors, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT with vectors, David Given
- Re: LuaJIT with vectors, Mike Pall
- Optimizing interpreters (was Re: LuaJIT with vectors), Mark Hamburg
- Re: Optimizing interpreters (was Re: LuaJIT with vectors), Mike Pall