Re: any plan about luajit2 support 5.2!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: any plan about luajit2 support 5.2!
- From: Mike Pall <mikelu-1011@...>
- Date: 2010年11月19日 12:05:50 +0100
Paul Hudson wrote:
> How much more work would it be to continue and interpret/JITcompile the C
> code too? :)
Would need quite a bit more work. Might be useful for handling
C inline functions, instead of just giving up on them.
> ("Ha-ha only serious", I think)
Yeah, I thought so, too. But then I had to add a C expression
parser and evaluator. Ick. Array declarators take a 'constant
expression' and quite a few headers make liberal use of this.
So just add the handful of C control-flow constructs and you
end up with something like tcc ...
[Nope, the world doesn't need another feeble C compiler.]
--Mike
- References:
- Re: any plan about luajit2 support 5.2!, Mike Pall
- Re: any plan about luajit2 support 5.2!, Alex Bradbury
- Re: any plan about luajit2 support 5.2!, Mike Pall
- Re: any plan about luajit2 support 5.2!, Alex Bradbury
- Re: any plan about luajit2 support 5.2!, Mike Pall
- Re: any plan about luajit2 support 5.2!, Josh Haberman
- Re: any plan about luajit2 support 5.2!, Mike Pall
- Re: any plan about luajit2 support 5.2!, Patrick Donnelly
- Re: any plan about luajit2 support 5.2!, Mike Pall
- Re: any plan about luajit2 support 5.2!, Paul Hudson