Re: 5.2 work3 manual
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: 5.2 work3 manual
- From: "Stuart P. Bentley" <stuart@...>
- Date: 2010年5月22日 15:31:41 -0700
But that ignores my point: should the documentation say:
The length of a table t is defined to be any integer index n such that
rawget(t,n) is not nil and rawget(t,n+1) is nil
rather than
The length of a table t is defined to be any integer index n such that
t[n] is not nil and t[n+1] is nil
?
I'd say, unless # is changed to respect metamethods, yes.
- References:
- Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
- Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
- Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Duncan Cross
- Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
- Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
- Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
- Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Tony Finch
- Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Doug Currie
- Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Tony Finch
- Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Doug Currie